Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want fanless arm linux machine, why not macbook m2 air + asahi linux ?
Asahi still doesn't support a lot of basic things like: external displays, Thunderbolt, hardware accelerated video decoding, 120hz refresh rate, etc.
Qualcomm Linux 2.0
61–70 of 71 posts
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#62Qualcomm is not a good software steward. Every time I used something they had their hand in, it was abandoned rather sooner than later. Eudora: bought, milked, killed. BREW: rotted. AllJoyn: dead. Toq/Mirasol: gone in two years. CodeAurora: shut down. And the $899 Snapdragon Dev Kit: shipped months late, then cancelled with support "paused indefinitely" while units were still in transit. Even Adreno drivers barely ge…
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#63Yocto sounds like it makes me feel when I use it
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#64Qualcomm is not a good software steward. Every time I used something they had their hand in, it was abandoned rather sooner than later. Eudora: bought, milked, killed. BREW: rotted. AllJoyn: dead. Toq/Mirasol: gone in two years. CodeAurora: shut down. And the $899 Snapdragon Dev Kit: shipped months late, then cancelled with support "paused indefinitely" while units were still in transit. Even Adreno drivers barely ge…
[0] https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-eudora-email-client-sou...
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#65And here I was hoping they'd decided to support Linux on the Snapdragon X2 chips.
When will folks learn companies only support Linux or any other FOSS to the extent their own business goals? None of them are on the game for the well being of the community or whatever. Profits and lower R&D costs, that is all.
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
holy hell.. the price tags...!
why on earth would anyone buy that shit if you can buy a macbook pro that literally looks and feels like art vs. a plastic windows laptop? it used to be that Apple was the pricier option but I guess not anymore
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Asahi still doesn't support a lot of basic things like: external displays, Thunderbolt, hardware accelerated video decoding, 120hz refresh rate, etc.
It supports external displays, just not on any port
It seems that external displays are only supported on HDMI (e.g. Mac Mini) but DP Alt mode is still listed as WIP so I'd assume MacBook's with only USB-C (all of them?) can't support an external display.
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Upstream requires a level of quality most developers cannot meet.
"Quality" is maybe overloaded. Upstream requires the code to meet their sense of taste, and some of that is about quality, and some of that is about undocumented design concepts. It's not hard to meet the quality bar. Meeting the design requirements is extremely hard.
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why can’t upstream just take their drivers? Isn’t that the point of requiring those drivers to be GPL?
Linux tries to avoid special cases. That means that when someone shows up with a new driver that's either not something that fits into an existing category, or which sort of (but doesn't entirely) overlap with an existing driver, there's an extended set of design discussions about how to make this new driver fit into existing infrastructure in a way that's consistent with what's there and which also allows new things…
All the subsystems to run a laptop should already be there, no?
Re: Qualcomm Linux 2.0
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linux tries to avoid special cases. That means that when someone shows up with a new driver that's either not something that fits into an existing category, or which sort of (but doesn't entirely) overlap with an existing driver, there's an extended set of design discussions about how to make this new driver fit into existing infrastructure in a way that's consistent with what's there and which also allows new things…
I get that. But it's a platform that is so similar to existing Linux on ARM offerings. All the subsystems to run a laptop should already be there, no?