Live data from Hacker News

International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

news.mccombs.utexas.edu

61–65 of 65 posts

Re: International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

#61
The US has a trade deficit, that means other countries are increasingly holding foreign reserves denominated in USD. To balance the money flow, the US has to sell its capital stock to the countries it is importing from, which includes the housing stock.

Usually this would be welcomed for housing, because e.g. the Chinese are funding local housing construction at ridiculous prices but Americans hate each other so they try to pull up each other's ladder.

Re: International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which form do I file to claim that my empty house is not actually empty?

Maybe demand the electricity bill? How do insurance companies deal with this kind of misrepresentation?

They just refuse to pay out if it seems like you lied. They don't enforce everything before a claim is filed.

Re: International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

#63
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In my circles, everyone buys a house to live in it and that's it. Really? Are they buying the tiniest cheapest apartments or chalets to live in while they save up money to upgrade to something bigger later? Or are they buying the biggest and best thing that the bank will allow? Because I'm mostly seeing the latter. Which means they are using the monetary system to get the best deal they can. The only people purchas…

I currently live in Italy and always lived in an European city. Most apartments are tiny here.

Do people buy a tiny apartment to live in as their first real estate purchase? Or do they buy something bigger?

Re: International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Taxing empty housing seems like the obvious answer. Make it more expensive and more work to keep it empty than it is to fill it.

This wouldn't be necessary if we weren't using zoning to restrict supply . The restrictions are what cause scarcity, and it's the scarcity that drives up prices. Land owners are already well incentivized not to let housing sit empty, unless their housing's value is being artificially pushed upward through the scarcity we create. Basically, if we quit creating the housing problem with zoning restrictions, you wouldn't…

Having had a second to think, it's rent control that's the issue, so the solution would be to get rid of that. Totally politically untenable, but rent control is why landlords are incentivized to leave places vacant.

Re: International investment and local rules push prices up faster than supply

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This wouldn't be necessary if we weren't using zoning to restrict supply . The restrictions are what cause scarcity, and it's the scarcity that drives up prices. Land owners are already well incentivized not to let housing sit empty, unless their housing's value is being artificially pushed upward through the scarcity we create. Basically, if we quit creating the housing problem with zoning restrictions, you wouldn't…

Having had a second to think, it's rent control that's the issue, so the solution would be to get rid of that. Totally politically untenable, but rent control is why landlords are incentivized to leave places vacant.

Even without rent control, it's often easier to leave a place empty because it keeps your risk lower. In places that allow supply to keep up with demand, notably Japan, buildings depreciate fairly quickly, so your investment goes away if you aren't actively monetizing it.
Post reply on HN