For those not following the debate of X, there have been a surge of doctors who are saying that full body scans are net negative. The argument is that current full body scans often have false positives, and our treatment of false positives is bad including risky biopsies. Some have gone so far as to literally state early detection does not lead to better outcomes (simply not true - genuine early detection is very hel…
>The argument is that current full body scans often have false positives, and our treatment of false positives is bad
Maybe we need better treatment of the results rather than less scans?