Live data from Hacker News

Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 124 posts

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#63

Hyde: http://ringce.com/hyde

Hyde has not been significantly modified in nearly a year. If you're looking for a Python-based static site generator, Pelican http://getpelican.com/> is under active development.

(Disclaimer: I'm a Pelican project committer.)

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#68

NestaCMS got my vote, because it's what I use for my blog. Is it really a static site generator, though? It can be used as one, I guess, but I think of it as a dyamic Sinatra app.

I've used NestaCMS and it's great, but I also wouldn't really consider it a static site generator.

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#69
I've used NestaCMS (which I would consider a more dynamic Sinatra app than a static site generator) and my current site is built with Jekyll. A lot of these seem interesting (specifically Middleman), but I really don't have the endurance to try them all out.

So, let's hear it. What makes your favorite better than Jekyll?

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#70
Just plain html/css plus Mustache (the logic-less tempaltes).

Not much new things to learn, literally no limits and a lot of freedom.

And here is my toolset:

LIVEditor: Edit html and css and see the result instantly (http://liveditor.com, my own project, you can imagine LIVEditor = Web Browser + Code Editor + Html Inspector like the one in Firebug).

Mustache: Use this logic-less template system to represent reusable content in the html.

Python: Call pystache to stuff the {{mustache}} templates in the html files.

Post reply on HN