Live data from Hacker News

Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

github.com

61–70 of 111 posts

Re: Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

#61
> Simple parameter tweaks bypass the model entirely; adjusting a slider does a deterministic regex update on the SCAD source, requiring no LLM call.

Why do you use regex for that? OpenSCAD allows you to pass data natively, no? What’s the advantage of the regex over using that?

Re: Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

#62

What exactly is the use case for this? Just making pretty little 3d models? There are so many reasons why I, as an engineer, will never even attempt to use AI for mechanical design, that trying to list them all is about to give me an autistic screeching fit. Even if all I need is a simple little bracket or something, I can model that and know it's right much quicker than I can ask the AI to do it and then check it's…

This doesn’t seem to be for machining CAD but more like stuff you would 3D print at home

Re: Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

#64

> Simple parameter tweaks bypass the model entirely; adjusting a slider does a deterministic regex update on the SCAD source, requiring no LLM call. Why do you use regex for that? OpenSCAD allows you to pass data natively, no? What’s the advantage of the regex over using that?

This is so the .scad file stays the canonical state. With -D, the rendered geometry diverges from what the file says.

Re: Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

#66

sigh, another text to cad startup. You guys really don't get it; Engineering is about 5% of your time modeling in CAD. The other 95% is the actual hard annoying work. GO AUTOMATE THAT FIRST!

tackling all that in: https://adam.new/

don't you worry ;)

Re: Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

#67
post #12

> A complete V8 internal combustion engine Yeah, no, that's a lie. This isn't a CAD model. It's a fantasy 3d model that looks like it's straight out of Gearhead Garage (1999). Any time I see these 'AI CAD' solutions it's always toys, toys, toys. Show me something functional that you've actually manufactured (shitty 3D prints don't count). Or at least show me something that can actually be assembled and isn't just a b…

We could defo update our readme! What do you think of this?: https://x.com/aaronli/status/2064876123109089742?s=20 Fable 5 in our Fusion Extension.

This is still a toy.

The design is non-manufacturable and doesn't have any actual intent baked into it let alone communicated. If you can accurately capture intent and purpose encoded into a design and also generate relevant GD&T that might be a good start.

Post reply on HN