Live data from Hacker News

Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

mybricklog.com

61–70 of 704 posts

Re: Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

#62

[flagged]

I don't use it that way, but it is correct. "The property owner or police barred you from the property." I had never heard it until recently, and now this is the third time I've heard it used that way.

hear cops often say it like that on body cam footage

Re: Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

#64
post #10

Adults ruined LEGO. There I said it.

Star Wars LEGO seems to be the worst. I went to the Bellevue, WA store a few years ago before Christmas. I have no interest in SW or SW LEGO (I'm much more into the Architecture series).

I was walking around though, and an associate came up to me and pointed out that the Death Star (IIRC) was about to stop being sold so if I wanted one I should grab it... "... and that we have several of it, so if you want allll of them."

I despise scalping, though, but perhaps I should.

Re: Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that hard to understand. A man gave a store merchandise on consignment, signed a contract with the store manager. The manager lost control of the store to corporate. The goods were still there, still on display and being sold. Corporate says, "this is mine now" and refuses to honor the contract. "It wasn't our name on it, says right here that the previous store manager signed this, and she's no longer with u…

Corporate is also claiming that they don't allow stores to take on consignment deals, contrary to their franchise agreement explicitly allowing franchise owners to take on consignment deals.

The (former) franchise owner shared their contract with BAM that explicitly allowed consignments.

Re: Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

#69
There seems to be a lot of misinformation in the comments, I would assume because the linked article doesn't cover many of the developments.

The youtuber Reckless Ben has recently covered the story and spearheaded a campaign of "provocative journalism" against the store[0]. Regardless of whether you support the way in which he goes about things, his video explains the story in much greater detail, and enormously expands on the malpractice of Bricks and Minifigs and the local police department.

Here are some bulletpoints in case you do not care to watch Part 1 + Part 2:

- Bricks and Minifigs explicitly threatened both the previous owners of the store and the original owner of the collection with lengthy legal battles

- The owner of the collection tried going the legal route but was quoted prices that he couldn't afford, so youtube was his last resort

- Bricks and Minifigs CEO publicly admitted of having the collection, being aware of the issue, and not wanting to give it back, while at the same time trying to run PR campaigns denying the allegations.

- BAM leadership went out of its way to create legal trouble for Reckless Ben, involving the police and fabricating false evidence about him

- The local police went out of its way to legally stop Ben, arrest him without probable cause, try to plant Heroin on his car, and even *ended up swatting his house*, dislocating his shoulder.

- All of this while the police department illegally scrubbed any incriminating evidence from the bodycam recordings they were obligated to provide.

This is an *insane* story that doesn't get enough credit. It not only exposes the inefficacy of (parts of) the American justice system, but also the enormous level of corruption and abuse of power of the American police (and tangentially the Mormon community)

I really recommend watching both videos. I promise you it's even more insane than it sounds like.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wscQpkcwgNU

Re: Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection

#70

[flagged]

As I understand it, "to be trespassed" is a term of art that basically means "the cops were called, told that person was trespassing, the cops duly informed that person they are trespassing & had to leave the property, and the person left, but was not charged". It's basically establishing a legal trail so that if the person refuses to leave or continues to trespass at that location in the future they have a better basis for charging them.
Post reply on HN