Live data from Hacker News

A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

wired.com

61–70 of 143 posts

Re: A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

#62

Any competitive sailor or foil-racer knows that the underwater surface has the least friction and best laminar flow when sanded with fine-grid sandpaper, around 1000 to 1500 grid. It always surprised me that this was not true in air and airplane wings were supposedly best when glossy. So now it turns out that this is indeed not true, and airfoils also benefit from micro-roughness for lowest friction. Now the surprisi…

I wonder how quickly airlines will adopt sanded/rough wings. It's also interesting that the efficiency of winglets were known for quite awhile but only somewhat recently have nearly all airliners adopted them.

Modifications to an approved type design, especially for commercial passenger aircraft, are an intensely bureaucratic and thus very expensive process. This is part of the reason why product cycles are long.

Re: A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

#64

Any competitive sailor or foil-racer knows that the underwater surface has the least friction and best laminar flow when sanded with fine-grid sandpaper, around 1000 to 1500 grid. It always surprised me that this was not true in air and airplane wings were supposedly best when glossy. So now it turns out that this is indeed not true, and airfoils also benefit from micro-roughness for lowest friction. Now the surprisi…

The core tenant of the paper is that roughness reduces drag IN the transition zone. A very small region of the total flow. Thats the region between laminar and turbulent flow. Laminar flow is typically 5x less drag than turbulent, and will be encountered about a Reynolds number of 500K-1M (ratio of inertial flow to viscous flow). Surfboards will have a Reynolds number of 10^7 which is entirely turbulent. A Cessna air…

> core tenant

And Lady Mondegreen.

Re: A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

#66
post #9

> It's long been accepted that the smoother the surface, the lower the aerodynamic drag. That turns out not always to be the case. Huh... I'd always heard that a golf ball's dimples help reduce drag?

And the Mig-29 too but according to the reply that's different

Re: A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

#68
post #31

It's almost certainly my adblocker playing poorly with their "subscribe to read" stuff, but I had to lol at the failure mode. When I load the page, I get the splash image/headline, and below it: > Subscribe to listen [9 minutes] > Aerodynamic drag is a major “barrier” in high-speed airplanes, automobiles, and bullet trains. This is because a design with less aerodynamic drag allows the aircraft to move at higher spee…

Same stuff! I’d rather prefer some archive link or something. Some websites are a bit aggressive these days.

Re: A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned

#69
post #31

It's almost certainly my adblocker playing poorly with their "subscribe to read" stuff, but I had to lol at the failure mode. When I load the page, I get the splash image/headline, and below it: > Subscribe to listen [9 minutes] > Aerodynamic drag is a major “barrier” in high-speed airplanes, automobiles, and bullet trains. This is because a design with less aerodynamic drag allows the aircraft to move at higher spee…

Same stuff! I’d rather prefer some archive link or something. Some websites are a bit aggressive these days.

If you happened to know Japanese it’s much easier to read the original article on wiredjp than .com https://wired.jp/article/distributed-micro-roughness-aerodyn...
Post reply on HN