Live data from Hacker News

Codex-maxxing

jxnl.co

61–70 of 90 posts

Re: Codex-maxxing

#61
I'm trying to get out of this. I'm a blind person. No one in tech goes to bed thinking about us, as it were. So, as a non-programmer, vibe coding accessibility fixes was an outlet to the daily million papercuts of using operating systems built by people who cannot understand me.

Well, I have barely anything to show for months of this. I made Termux more accessible on Android, made an MUD client for Emacs, fixed up some Emacspeak stuff because it's been abandonned going on 3 years now, and Emacs packages wait for no one, and tried added Grade 2 Braille entry support to BRLTTY. That failed because depression sucks and who would even use this vibe coded junk anyway.

The more open nature of Android made it rather easier. How far behind in features TalkBack is compared to VoiceOver, besides AI image description, made it feel like trying to heal a broken arm with pain pills. So I'm trying to tell myself that I can't fix everything, and that it's not my fault if other people, and companies, choose to not consider accessibility. I mean I can't help Google if they choose to not be helped.

Ah well, Global Accessibility Awareness Day is this Thursday. Maybe Apple will finally announce LLM image descriptions, and hopefully my iPhone 16 will be good enough for them because I can't afford to upgrade in this economy.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#62
post #39
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've understood it as obsessive optimization to the point that it's a mental health problem. Case in point, looksmaxxing.

Ever since it's breached the mainstream, I think you can just append it to anything to make things sound funnier. It has mostly lost its meaning. "I'm breakfastmaxxing. I'm a cerealpilled bowlcel in my milk era. I'm a slicemoded breadchad." etc.

"cerealpilled bowlcel" send me to another dimension.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#63

I'm trying to get out of this. I'm a blind person. No one in tech goes to bed thinking about us, as it were. So, as a non-programmer, vibe coding accessibility fixes was an outlet to the daily million papercuts of using operating systems built by people who cannot understand me. Well, I have barely anything to show for months of this. I made Termux more accessible on Android, made an MUD client for Emacs, fixed up so…

Sounds like you're contributing to the solution.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#64

Is this LLM psychosis? So much tending and conversing with the matmuls but what was the outcome? Are people who get this into it more successful somehow? It reminds me of people who take drugs and get "revelations" but then are not particularly over represented in the group of successful people for all of their deep insights.

Psychosis would be a mental illness with symptoms like losing track of reality. I think there might actually be a bit of an anti-AI psychosis where individuals are projecting their fear and paranoia onto others and seeking confirmation bias. The need to dismiss the success others are having with AI could be triggered by personal insecurities. And of course deep paranoia is one of the classical symptoms of an actual psychosis. Just holding up a mirror here.

BTW. I have friends and relatives that have dealt with an actual psychosis. Not fun to experience up close. So, I don't want to take this metaphor too far. But if we're using big words like psychosis here, you might want to examine your motives, insecurities and reasoning a bit.

I've played with agentic AIs for coding and other use cases and have had some successes and failures. I'm fairly impressed with some stuff that is possible now and I use technology pragmatically. As I always have throughout my 30 year career.

For any new thing, there are always early adopters and those who really don't get it. And most other people let the early adopters figure things out and then end up copying what works some months/years later. And you always have some stragglers that can't or won't adapt that can't be helped.

Most of what this person describes in the article is very reasonable. Codex might not be the best model. But in terms of UX, OpenAI is getting a few things right that starting to make a difference. It's only a few months ago that their desktop app launched. It has gone through a pretty rapid evolution. As of a few weeks ago (it's that recent) you can install skills to connect your gmail, canva, google drive, work with ppt files, etc. In other words, it's now suitable for things other than programming. Before that, Claude CoWork was a few weeks earlier. So, this is all very new and fresh. I've tried some of this stuff and it mostly works as advertised.

The big picture here is that last year was about programmers discovering agentic AIs. This year, the business world is following. And there will be a lot of drama of people over doing it, making mistakes, etc. And lots of people whining about how they need to change and insisting that they shouldn't have to. Etc. But this stuff is clearly happening if you look through the noise a bit.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#65
post #3

Most people I know underutilize voice mode. Such a game changer for making brain dumps the LLM can just gobble up

I hear a lot of praises. Can you explain? If I can type as fast as I speak, does that still matter in such case? Does it make use of intonation or is it pure speech to text?

Re: Codex-maxxing

#66
post #54
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OpenAI per employee valuation is $150M+ (almost 100x of per employee valuation of our company). I think it may make sense to ponder a bit why a $150M engineer would have such an idea. May it be it is the preferred way of doing things in the new AI world, a paradigm shift.

We all know the most highly valued people in the world are the smartest. In fact, the more money you're being paid, the more value you add, the more your opinion is worth, and the more skill you have. The amount of money you're worth is actually directly proportional to your worth as a human being (/s)

Reminds me of this dialogue between a money manager and MIT economist Paul Cootner:

- "If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich?"

- "If you’re so rich, why aren’t you smart?"

Re: Codex-maxxing

#67

Is this LLM psychosis? So much tending and conversing with the matmuls but what was the outcome? Are people who get this into it more successful somehow? It reminds me of people who take drugs and get "revelations" but then are not particularly over represented in the group of successful people for all of their deep insights.

More like money psychosis. If enough people buy into this vision, he gets to be a billionaire.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#68
Hey they added heartbeats? Wasn't that the killer feature OpenClaw had? I haven't used it in a while, but imagine they'd be pretty similar now.

Main difference would be just in how they're used (general purpose assistant vs "coding assistant") but the actual capabilities seem to be identical.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#69

Is this LLM psychosis? So much tending and conversing with the matmuls but what was the outcome? Are people who get this into it more successful somehow? It reminds me of people who take drugs and get "revelations" but then are not particularly over represented in the group of successful people for all of their deep insights.

That last part is also true without the drugs. Forbidden knowledge does not make one popular at parties.

Re: Codex-maxxing

#70
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would I want OpenAI to gobble up my brain dumps?

These cloud LLMs are not the tool for you then I suppose. There are local models too, unless your point is why use LLMs, in which case, you don't need to.

No I do use them, for specific, targetted jobs, with 'well' defined specs.
Post reply on HN