Live data from Hacker News

WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

nytimes.com

61–70 of 260 posts

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#61
post #22

I read elsewhere that this strain is less deadly than previous strains. I'm no epidemiologist but being less deadly could allow it to spread further, which is obviously concerning. Also, the article says surveillance picked up the spread late. I wonder if the US's pulling back from the WHO and other international functions had anything to do with this, it used to make up a big chunk of its resources and staff.

The WHO is just another politically subverted organization. It declared covid for half an eternity as not airborne. If its connected with a loos of face or economic short term losses- many actors will put the pressur on to prevent the declaration of an pandemic or other travell restrictions. The us is not involved in this mess.

> us is not involved in this mess

If by not involved you mean still massively subject to the public health and econonomic consequences of a containment failure, then sure.

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#62
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ll solve the second to last one for you! I know multiple people who had Covid, and very quickly died, of Covid.

[flagged]

Something like half the population in the US is "metabolically unhealthy". Hopefully the new weight loss drugs will fix some of this.

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#63

I read elsewhere that this strain is less deadly than previous strains. I'm no epidemiologist but being less deadly could allow it to spread further, which is obviously concerning. Also, the article says surveillance picked up the spread late. I wonder if the US's pulling back from the WHO and other international functions had anything to do with this, it used to make up a big chunk of its resources and staff.

[flagged]

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#65
post #47
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People with the flu tend to self-isolate showing symptoms. Do you have any other fantasy tales you’d like to tell?

The world is bigger than the US. Also, not everybody in the US is an underpaid service worker with no benefits. Also, if you limit yourself to just the US, you're still just wrong [1]: > Approximately one-quarter (26%, n = 303/1169) of adults (aged 16–64 years) with self-reported ILI took time off work for their illness for a mean of 3.3 days, compared with 31% (n = 31/99) and 20% (n = 3/15) of those with confirmed i…

You've replied to the wrong comment.

Anyway: taking time off work when too sick to work != isolating when the symptoms first appear.

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#67
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this case I'd guess the DOGE cuts to foreign aid are a massive, massive contributor to the problem. A lot of third-world countries heavily relied on USAID et al to keep basic sanitation and healthcare going.

[flagged]

How callously you blame the victims. Remember your humanity.

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#68

"It is unclear how that [closure of US-AID program] might have affected the response to this outbreak." But, we'll just throw that in to the story anyway, even though we have no facts either way.

> we'll just throw that in to the story anyway, even though we have no facts either way

We don't have a tight chain of causation. But we have plenty of facts pointing entirely one way.

We know there was "a critical four-week detection gap between the onset of symptoms of the presumed index case...and the laboratory confirmation of the outbreak" [1]. This has contributed to "significant uncertainties to the true number of infected persons and geographic spread associated with this event at the present time" [2]. And tying all of this back to DOGE, we know USAID's "more than 50 staffers dedicated to outbreak response" were cut to "just six people to handle Ebola, Marburg virus, mpox and bird flu preparedness" [3].

Musk and Trump didn't cause this outbreak. But we would have had a better chance of catching this sooner, and with more precision, if we had those resources there.

[1] https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2...

[2] https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-d...

[3] https://www.spyuganda.com/another-one-us-cuts-aid-to-fight-e...

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#69

"It is unclear how that [closure of US-AID program] might have affected the response to this outbreak." But, we'll just throw that in to the story anyway, even though we have no facts either way.

Just wondering, do you think it's not relevant to help the reader understand context on the US' impact? Positive or negative?

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#70

This is the WHO announcement: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-d... This is our CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html And yes, this is a big deal. Public health emergencies of international concern are a short list consisting of, in their entirety: swine flu ('09 to '10), polio ('14 on), ebola ('13 to '16), Zika ('16), ebola ('19 to '20), Covid ('20 to '23), monkeypox (…

[dead]
Post reply on HN