Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Operation: Epic Furious

epicfurious.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 137 posts

Re: Operation: Epic Furious

#61

Post by barnabee »

jansan wrote: post #9

I know this is frowned upon on HN, so feel free to vote me down. But it only works on Firefox for me, not on Chrome. Error Message on Chrome: Error: Failed to initialize graphics. at SceneManager.initGraphics (rmmz_managers.js:1957:15) at SceneManager.initialize (rmmz_managers.js:1929:10) at SceneManager.initialize (CGMZ_Core.js:1662:41) at SceneManager.run (rmmz_managers.js:1918:14) at Main.onEffekseerLoad (main.js:…

> it only works on Firefox for me, not on Chrome

Sounds like a feature, not a bug

Re: Operation: Epic Furious

#62

Post by avador »

mschuster91 wrote: post #52
avador wrote: post #38

epicfurious.com is blocked by my service provider. It’s a small, local, fiber company called mornington. They do not say why in the returned html. I do not approve of such blockage. Nevertheless. Knowledge is knowledge. So I post for everyone’s sake.

A DNS WHOIS [1] shows what's likely the cause: > Important Dates: Created 4/28/2026 Many an ISP these days blocks domains that have been registered less than a month ago because most scam campaigns have to cycle through domains way faster than that time. Check if you have enabled some sort of "malware protection" at your ISP, because that usually is based on DNS filtering. [1] https://who.is/whois/epicfurious.com

Useful - thank you. I will contact them.

Re: Operation: Epic Furious

#66

Post by epistasis »

avador wrote: post #38

epicfurious.com is blocked by my service provider. It’s a small, local, fiber company called mornington. They do not say why in the returned html. I do not approve of such blockage. Nevertheless. Knowledge is knowledge. So I post for everyone’s sake.

I was going to say that political censorship is out of control in the US, but that appears to be a Canadian ISP?

Re: Operation: Epic Furious

#69

Post by captainbland »

an0malous wrote: post #49

It's great except the war is obviously for Israel not oil, we had more access to oil before the war

I mean it's not clear the current state of things was the ambition before the war, a while back they were talking about seizing Kharg island which indicates capturing oil resources was an objective
Post reply on HN