LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

Post by vrganj » Thu, May 07, 2026, 2:18 PM UTC

k33n wrote: post #33

greggoB wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It’s a very European concept, that making life difficult is a worthy pursuit This is an incredibly bold statement, and something I really cannot relate to having lived in Europe for over a decade. It comes across as more of a knee-jerk reaction from someone who believes oversight or accountability of any kind is by definition a needless burden.

I’m an incredibly bold guy. And I would personally just stop operating in the EU if it was between that and being accountable to their bureaucrats.

Post by shimman » Thu, May 07, 2026, 2:35 PM UTC

robin_reala wrote: post #18

k33n wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

It’s about having rights, and exercising them. If companies find that difficult to work with then they’re not even hitting the minimum baseline.

Post by ChrisArchitect » Thu, May 07, 2026, 2:45 PM UTC

Post by therobots927 » Thu, May 07, 2026, 2:46 PM UTC

rusk wrote: post #45

duxup wrote: post #41

I'm not a fan of how LinkedIn operates ... or the culture there in general. At the same time I wonder what happens when users realize everything they look at is now more visible than ever? People just make fake accounts for browsing? Maybe it should be that way, but there's an interesting dynamic to "what you look at (even if not a full picture) is visible to some people".

Like a reverse panopticon - a truly terrifying concept if you tease it out …

Post by theturtlemoves » Thu, May 07, 2026, 2:49 PM UTC

isodev wrote: post #68

theturtlemoves wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Correction, we hate making money at the expense of other peoples rights and liberties. It's kind of frustrating to have to explain that to US folks over and over again... all that "freedom" in their things is apparently very decorative.