Live data from Hacker News

I Do Not Recommend Bitwarden

xn--gckvb8fzb.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: I Do Not Recommend Bitwarden

#61

This is such a HN blog post it's almost funny. You wanted to selfhost and you can but it wasn't easy or particularly Linux friendly, so you got a Rust server from the community, but you wanted something officially supported, so they made a specifically lightweight self-hostable version but it's in a programming language you don't like. :( Those bastards!

[dead]

Re: I Do Not Recommend Bitwarden

#62
post #19

Bitwarden have in my opinion is one of the BEST business models a user can ask for. It's open-source, and I can self-host (100% free) and the free version is really, really good too, and then a premium version is $20/year which is very reasonably priced. Also for cloud hosted password manager, you're always going to have attacks no matter what, but at least they are transparent about it .. (unlike say LastPass, Norto…

>And the free version is really, really good too, and then a premium version is $20/year which is very reasonably priced.

I've been paying a flat $10 since 2022. Today, I got an email saying my renewal price goes up to $20 plus tax, which totals $25. The loyal member 25% discount just eliminates the tax for me.

Given that all I've used it for is password and login storage and TOTP all these years, I don't find a 200% price increase to be reasonable. I've cancelled the premium, I can run my TOTP somewhere else.

Post reply on HN