Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
61–70 of 116 posts
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly! If we're gonna give this actual attention, we should be focusing on the fact that they should be banned from any form of insider trading or major conflict of interest!
They are blocked from insider trading I think this in the previous comment undervalue just how many more complicated ways there are for corruption to bubble. Assume super strict rules. Consider this example to circumvent them: Senator-elect A makes an LLC and invest their money (with some friends) in it (before taking office) They can’t even talk to the money manager. But the manager can see their actions, and the se…
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#63Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#64"Prediction market" sounds much better than online gambling.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#65Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Fine. People motivated by money should take jobs other than sitting in Congress.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#66Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#67Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
They could even do the sort of things corporate execs at publicly traded companies do, and fill out forms well in advance about future investment purchases, to avoid the ability to time purchases to inside information.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#68Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#69Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.
Yeah, I kind of agree with your semi-sarcastic take. While that salary is well above the US average, the fact is that they almost certainly don't make enough to own or rent a home in DC, and a second home in their constituency. It all but ensures that there can't be an honest member of congress, unless they feel like sleeping in their office.
Isn't the solution to needing two homes to do the job for the government to provide that as a work expense rather than permitting funky financial hijinks?