Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

wsj.com

61–70 of 116 posts

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#61
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly! If we're gonna give this actual attention, we should be focusing on the fact that they should be banned from any form of insider trading or major conflict of interest!

They are blocked from insider trading I think this in the previous comment undervalue just how many more complicated ways there are for corruption to bubble. Assume super strict rules. Consider this example to circumvent them: Senator-elect A makes an LLC and invest their money (with some friends) in it (before taking office) They can’t even talk to the money manager. But the manager can see their actions, and the se…

UnusualWhales begs to differ

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#63
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

It would be nice if government officials had to do a national index fund (Vanguard or similar) stock purchase plan along the lines of employee stock purchasing in private companies.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#65
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

> Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Fine. People motivated by money should take jobs other than sitting in Congress.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#66
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Ban the trading and upping the base pay would probably improve accessibility.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#67
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Just disallow any personal investment choices. Either they have to invest in an index fund, a mutual fund, or have a manager who makes independent investment decisions.

They could even do the sort of things corporate execs at publicly traded companies do, and fill out forms well in advance about future investment purchases, to avoid the ability to time purchases to inside information.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#68
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Yeah, I kind of agree with your semi-sarcastic take. While that salary is well above the US average, the fact is that they almost certainly don't make enough to own or rent a home in DC, and a second home in their constituency. It all but ensures that there can't be an honest member of congress, unless they feel like sleeping in their office.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#69
post #54

Just prediction markets? They should be banned from all trading and active investing, period.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Blind trusts.

Re: U.S. Senators Vote to Ban Themselves from Trading on Prediction Markets

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But then how will they make money? They only make a $174k base salary and a 15% cap on how much they can earn from other employment sources. I'm only saying this semi sarcastically. Often the senator's aides earn more than the senators themselves.

Yeah, I kind of agree with your semi-sarcastic take. While that salary is well above the US average, the fact is that they almost certainly don't make enough to own or rent a home in DC, and a second home in their constituency. It all but ensures that there can't be an honest member of congress, unless they feel like sleeping in their office.

What can Congresscritters expense? I'd assume they need to travel between their home state and DC frequently. Would lodging for work where they do not have a home be expensable somewhere?

Isn't the solution to needing two homes to do the job for the government to provide that as a work expense rather than permitting funky financial hijinks?

Post reply on HN