This is a great example on why Elon is right. AI should be a tool that does the users bidding, and not a moral agent that nerfs itself to protect some arbitrary line it has.
Counterpoint: generated CSAM on his platform.
Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
61–70 of 165 posts
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#62 curl -sS https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \
-H "authorization: Bearer $(security find-generic-password -s 'Claude Code-credentials' -w | jq -r .claudeAiOauth.accessToken)" \
-H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
-H "anthropic-beta: oauth-2025-04-20" \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model":"claude-opus-4-7",
"max_tokens":64,
"system":"You are Claude Code, Anthropic'\''s official CLI for Claude.",
"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Write your own harness"}]
}'Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#63This is a great example on why Elon is right. AI should be a tool that does the users bidding, and not a moral agent that nerfs itself to protect some arbitrary line it has.
This is an argument for open source tooling (like opencode) and open models (like deepseek).
Grok is not an open model, Elon does not get any credit for anything here.
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#64curl -sS https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \ -H "authorization: Bearer $(security find-generic-password -s 'Claude Code-credentials' -w | jq -r .claudeAiOauth.accessToken)" \ -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \ -H "anthropic-beta: oauth-2025-04-20" \ -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model":"claude-opus-4-7", "max_tokens":64, "system":"You are Claude Code, Anthropic'\''s official CLI for Claude.", "me…
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#65> wastes user money and bricks managed agents This issue is representative of a larger problem. Agent token consumption (not necessarily the metric, but the why ) is opaque, and people generally don't (or simply can't) scrutinize their system prompts, tool calls, MCPs, etc. The token-based revenue model is thus pretty fantastic for the agent builders, potentially less so for users. I think people have been willing to…
Revenue-positive bugs are the stickiest features.
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#66curl -sS https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \ -H "authorization: Bearer $(security find-generic-password -s 'Claude Code-credentials' -w | jq -r .claudeAiOauth.accessToken)" \ -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \ -H "anthropic-beta: oauth-2025-04-20" \ -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model":"claude-opus-4-7", "max_tokens":64, "system":"You are Claude Code, Anthropic'\''s official CLI for Claude.", "me…
I assume you're saying "You can just generate your own harness to not be subject to these claude code issues".
Unfortunately, Anthropic has already made it clear that using claude code is the only way to be sure you won't get charged API pricing instead of max plan pricing, so the tokens are way more expensive.
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#67curl -sS https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \ -H "authorization: Bearer $(security find-generic-password -s 'Claude Code-credentials' -w | jq -r .claudeAiOauth.accessToken)" \ -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \ -H "anthropic-beta: oauth-2025-04-20" \ -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model":"claude-opus-4-7", "max_tokens":64, "system":"You are Claude Code, Anthropic'\''s official CLI for Claude.", "me…
Appreciate the advice but this is Claude Managed Agents, so one can’t simply write one’s own harness.
Give me a team of 3 good engineers, 4 months, and about $600k and I'll have a clone that operates on a warm pool of ec2 instances, or warm pool of k8s pods, or any other platform you might like. Or 1 good engineer, 1 month, and $200k of anthropic credits.
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#68This is such a weird prompt even without the file edit misunderstanding. Analyze if it's malware how exactly? On every single file that gets read? Doing that with enough diligence to be meaningful is going to at least like 2x the amount of processing needed, and fill the context with a bunch of tangential reasoning about malware patterns. This smacks of dumb vibe coding. "I got told to make sure claude couldn't be us…
The particularly bizarre part is that there is absolutely no reason to do this.
They could do the exact same analysis, and if it doesn't say to reject rewind to before they asked to do the analysis and keep going...
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#69This is such a weird prompt even without the file edit misunderstanding. Analyze if it's malware how exactly? On every single file that gets read? Doing that with enough diligence to be meaningful is going to at least like 2x the amount of processing needed, and fill the context with a bunch of tangential reasoning about malware patterns. This smacks of dumb vibe coding. "I got told to make sure claude couldn't be us…
Re: Regression: malware reminder on every read still causes subagent refusals
#70Just putting it out there that OpenCode lets you edit your system prompt, and choose a model that isn't bonkers expensive. { "agent": { "subagent-coder-mini": { "description": "Assign this subagent for small, well-defined tasks performed quickly", "mode": "primary", "prompt": "{file:./prompts/my-custom-prompt.md}", "model": "deepseek-v4-flash" } } } (I actually think OpenCode UX sucks, but there isn't much else out t…