Live data from Hacker News

Is my blue your blue? (2024)

ismy.blue

61–70 of 483 posts

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. It's like being asked is this black or white and being shown 50% grey.

That is the point of the exercise though. Is 50% really where you draw the line?

But the point is, there is no line which separates white and black (or green and blue). 50% grey is neither black nor white, it's grey. Turquoise is neither green nor blue, it's turquoise.

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. It's like being asked is this black or white and being shown 50% grey.

That’s the point of this. To find out where in that spectrum your vision lands, not to get a perfect score.

OP's point is that this isn't valid because neither of the answers are correct. If you're really trying to measure a spectrum then the answers should allow for fuzziness. That is, you have a range/confidence interval of where green ends and where blue starts and in between is neither/both.

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. It's like being asked is this black or white and being shown 50% grey.

Yeah, but is the gray to you more look more black or more white? That's the point.

It's like being asked whether yellow is more green or red. But it's different. You can't get yellow just from alpha blending green and red. You need additive color mixing.

Black and white are different. You can get grey just from blending them.

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#67

How much does display calibration factor into this? I'm fairly confident it must impact the results, but unsure how much error it would introduce.

I always wanted to have a color calibrator and a few years back i bought one. all my displays were so well defined out of the box, it wasnot worth it at all. Like you would need to use this particular profile for proper real industry printers to even have any benefit of it if even because all my displays were well calibrated. I would argue that this would only make sense for highly profesional graphics designer and i…

A lot of the color calibration obsession was from back when panels shipped with truly awful factory calibration. A quick perusal of rtings suggests that most manufacturers try and pre-calibrate their panels these days

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#68
One of my eyes sees (very) slightly greener than the other one.

But with both eyes I got

> Your boundary is at hue 174, just like the population median. You're a true neutral.

I should test with one eye.

Re: Is my blue your blue? (2024)

#70

I think there's an anchoring effect in play here. If you select blue -> blue -> green -> blue -> green -> blue -> green…, you land at the population median. (The point being that, once you get to a somewhat ambiguous point (after two blue selections), you can say "oh, well, compared to the last one this is {opposite color}!", and it seems most people do that.)

That doesn’t explain why I landed 92% off the population median.
Post reply on HN