Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Quarkdown – Markdown with Superpowers

quarkdown.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 151 posts

Re: Quarkdown – Markdown with Superpowers

#62

Post by iamgioh »

giwook wrote: post #40
pugworthy wrote: post #29

I guess yea I'm impressed, but to me the whole point of Markdown is that it's dirt simple. You can edit it and use it without any kind of GUI and have a pretty good idea what you are going to get. You can create it in VIM in a terminal, and trust what you did is going to look fine. Heck you can just look at the raw .md file and read it just fine. But then you start adding to it. Soon you find yourself looking up all…

Going to work on a Quarkdown with even more Superpowers and a seamless UI/UX so you don't need to remember all the odd new commands. I shall call it Microsoft Word.

I chuckled

Re: Quarkdown – Markdown with Superpowers

#64

Post by chrisweekly »

pugworthy wrote: post #29

I guess yea I'm impressed, but to me the whole point of Markdown is that it's dirt simple. You can edit it and use it without any kind of GUI and have a pretty good idea what you are going to get. You can create it in VIM in a terminal, and trust what you did is going to look fine. Heck you can just look at the raw .md file and read it just fine. But then you start adding to it. Soon you find yourself looking up all…

FWIW, Obsidian.md makes a fantastic WYSIWYG editor for basic markdown.

Re: Quarkdown – Markdown with Superpowers

#66

Post by BrandonS113 »

amai wrote: post #5

I would really like to see a comparison of all these tools/markup languages: - MyST - Pandoc - Quarkdown - Quarto - Typst Quarto and pandoc both use Pandoc Markdown (and so does https://www.zettlr.com/ ). But Quarkdown and Typst offer programmable markup languages like LaTeX (or HTML + Javascript). It seems the winner for the title official LaTeX successor is still not decided.

I really wanted to like Typst. No more latex would be fantastic. Decided to use it for a project, and had to give up and return to latex, just too many corner cases. Both things its missing from latex, and lack of Pandoc convertibility. Really hope it gets the last 10%

Re: Quarkdown – Markdown with Superpowers

#68

Post by looneysquash »

pugworthy wrote: post #29

I guess yea I'm impressed, but to me the whole point of Markdown is that it's dirt simple. You can edit it and use it without any kind of GUI and have a pretty good idea what you are going to get. You can create it in VIM in a terminal, and trust what you did is going to look fine. Heck you can just look at the raw .md file and read it just fine. But then you start adding to it. Soon you find yourself looking up all…

To me, one of the big features of markdown is it's half WYSIWYG.

By that I mean, the basics reuse the way we faked formatting to do real formatting. The input is (usually) perfectly readable on its own.

Even if you don't know (or remember) how to author a markdown file, you can probably still read it just fine. The tables still look like tables. The paragraphs are just paragraphs.

I do still have to look up how to do stuff in markdown sometimes. And that's fine. Your active vocabulary is always smaller than your passive one.

So the way I judge this is by how readable the input is.

I'm not sure how well they succeeded at that. A lot of what they show doesn't really add to or take away from that.

But I didn't see any examples of them formatting math. I only rarely use LaTex. And when I do, it's not because I need a "paged" mode or need to include an author. It's because I need to format something markdown can't do, and that's usually a math equation.

So I am curious how that ends up looking.

Post reply on HN