Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're referring to Cloudflare, the "security check" is not a default setting. For some reason administrators love to use Under attack mode as a band-aid measure to reduce load on the host.
Or they'll (the site operators using Cloudflare proxy) make ill considered firewall rules like "If not Chrome, require security check".
Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
61–70 of 107 posts
Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re saying a mastodon instance can’t vet DDosed?
Truth is if mastodon.social gets ddosd the same as Bluesky I can still use the rest of the network fine. Proof is in the pudding. tons of instances that make up the fabric of redundancy. I think most people would be served better if Bluesky acted differently early with their rollout in a sharded manner?
Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#63A decentralized protocol by definition should not be vulnerable to DDos attacks.
Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#64Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#65Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#66The prevalent discourse/attempt-at-a-meme-but-people-are-taking-it-seriously saying "Bluesky is down because of AI vibecoding!" is starting to get annoying and unoriginal. Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better."
> Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better." The context of the "jokes", regardless of if one finds them funny, is that this is exactly how AI boosters (including the bluesky team) have been behaving. Every little benefit, no matter how small or unfounded, was being attributed to AI usage. So people do the opposi…
Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re saying a mastodon instance can’t vet DDosed?
Truth is if mastodon.social gets ddosd the same as Bluesky I can still use the rest of the network fine. Proof is in the pudding. tons of instances that make up the fabric of redundancy. I think most people would be served better if Bluesky acted differently early with their rollout in a sharded manner?
Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#68Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#69Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better." The context of the "jokes", regardless of if one finds them funny, is that this is exactly how AI boosters (including the bluesky team) have been behaving. Every little benefit, no matter how small or unfounded, was being attributed to AI usage. So people do the opposi…
Nostr has the highest count of AI boosters per square meter I’ve ever seen, yet nobody seems to be DDoS’ing that.