Live data from Hacker News

Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

theverge.com

61–70 of 107 posts

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're referring to Cloudflare, the "security check" is not a default setting. For some reason administrators love to use Under attack mode as a band-aid measure to reduce load on the host.

Or they'll (the site operators using Cloudflare proxy) make ill considered firewall rules like "If not Chrome, require security check".

What's your point? You can configure this in Nginx too

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#62
post #16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re saying a mastodon instance can’t vet DDosed?

Truth is if mastodon.social gets ddosd the same as Bluesky I can still use the rest of the network fine. Proof is in the pudding. tons of instances that make up the fabric of redundancy. I think most people would be served better if Bluesky acted differently early with their rollout in a sharded manner?

Blacksky and other instances of bluesky are not affected, what are you talking about?

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#64
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Why would anyone blindly criticize AI tools, when there are so many flaws to see?

Clearly there are a plenty of people incorrectly blaming AI for bluesky outages, why indeed?

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#65
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DDoS saturates the network, not the service. Even a box doing nothing would still be unreachable.

Not true, a well done DDoS targets also underlying services (example hitting most consuming DB writes).

A well done DDoS gets the target depeered :)

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#66

The prevalent discourse/attempt-at-a-meme-but-people-are-taking-it-seriously saying "Bluesky is down because of AI vibecoding!" is starting to get annoying and unoriginal. Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better."

> Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better." The context of the "jokes", regardless of if one finds them funny, is that this is exactly how AI boosters (including the bluesky team) have been behaving. Every little benefit, no matter how small or unfounded, was being attributed to AI usage. So people do the opposi…

Nostr has the highest count of AI boosters per square meter I’ve ever seen, yet nobody seems to be DDoS’ing that.

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#67
post #16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re saying a mastodon instance can’t vet DDosed?

Truth is if mastodon.social gets ddosd the same as Bluesky I can still use the rest of the network fine. Proof is in the pudding. tons of instances that make up the fabric of redundancy. I think most people would be served better if Bluesky acted differently early with their rollout in a sharded manner?

This is half true. If mastodon.social goes down every single one of the accounts made on that instance go down as well. In truly decentralized protocols you own your identity and can take it elsewhere, for instance, in Nostr and SSB, a relay/pub going down is no big deal since you can connect to other servers and maintain communications.

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean the one for old ios versions?

You mean the iOS version people are refusing to upgrade from because of the shittified forced UI changes?

You aware that iOS 18 is patched right and "old" means 17 and before?

Re: Bluesky has been dealing with a DDoS attack for nearly a full day

#70
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even when Bluesky confirmed it's a DDoS, the line is now "maybe they wouldn't have gotten DDoSed if they didn't vibecode and their code was better." The context of the "jokes", regardless of if one finds them funny, is that this is exactly how AI boosters (including the bluesky team) have been behaving. Every little benefit, no matter how small or unfounded, was being attributed to AI usage. So people do the opposi…

Nostr has the highest count of AI boosters per square meter I’ve ever seen, yet nobody seems to be DDoS’ing that.

You have to care about something to DDOS it.
Post reply on HN