Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context for those unaware: the commenter, mikemcquaid, is the project lead for Homebrew.
Thank you, his arguments totally makes sense, only the part that makes me icky is: > There’s a new vibe coded Homebrew frontend with partial compatibility and improved speed every few weeks. People are free and probably do this because it is slow. Alternatives often are not a bad thing.
Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
61–70 of 156 posts
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#62Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many such examples for npm as well: many "compatible" managers, one registry.
Sorry, examples of what? Package managers that present themselves as replacements for other package managers? Or package managers that aren't compatible with the registry they're supposed to be compatible with? Your use of scare quotes is confusing.
You won't be having situation where one uses yarn and someone uses pnpm on the same project tho.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context for those unaware: the commenter, mikemcquaid, is the project lead for Homebrew.
Thank you, his arguments totally makes sense, only the part that makes me icky is: > There’s a new vibe coded Homebrew frontend with partial compatibility and improved speed every few weeks. People are free and probably do this because it is slow. Alternatives often are not a bad thing.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow they are finally getting away from Ruby? Awesome. The speed will be a nice boon
Yeah I don't know why people are saying that speed doesn't matter. I use Homebrew and it is slow. It's like yum vs apt in the Linux world. APT (C++) is fast and yum (Python) was slow. Both work fine, but yum would just add a few seconds, or a minute, of little frustrations multiple times a day. It adds up. They finally fixed it with dnf (C++) and now yum is deprecated. Glad to hear a Rust rewrite is coming to Homebre…
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context for those unaware: the commenter, mikemcquaid, is the project lead for Homebrew.
Thank you, his arguments totally makes sense, only the part that makes me icky is: > There’s a new vibe coded Homebrew frontend with partial compatibility and improved speed every few weeks. People are free and probably do this because it is slow. Alternatives often are not a bad thing.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#67If it doesn’t ever execute Ruby: it cannot be compatible with Homebrew. “Compatible” is doing a bit of work here when it also means “implicitly relies on Homebrew’s CDN, CI, packaging infrastructure and maintainers who keep all this running”. There’s a new vibe coded Homebrew frontend with partial compatibility and improved speed every few weeks. Homebrew is working on an official Rust frontend that will actually hav…
Context for those unaware: the commenter, mikemcquaid, is the project lead for Homebrew.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, Apple stopped providing security fixes for Mojave ~4+ years ago, and there have been 7 or 8 new os releases since then… I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect an open source project to support everything
I agree in principle but Homebrew only supports the latest 3 versions of macOS. Right now Ventura 13 which came out in October 2022 is unsupported.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same criticism has been said of Deno and Pnpm and bun, and yet, despite all these years since their respective releases, node and npm remain slower than all three options.
Yeah, but do they work ? Last time I gave bun a chance their runtime had serious issues with frequent crashes. Faster package installation or spin-up time is meaningless if it comes at the cost of stability and compatibility.
Never had any issues.
Re: Nanobrew: The fastest macOS package manager compatible with brew
#70This feels like a solution looking for a problem. I have a couple hundred brew packages on my system and I’ve never sat there thinking “If this was only 2 seconds faster…” while doing an update. I’m sure the Homebrew folks could mine this for a few ideas of how to further optimize brew, but I don’t think I’ll be adopting it anytime soon. Compatibility is more important than speed in this case.
It constantly blows my mind how insanely long it takes just to do a few simple things on the fastest hardware I've ever owned in my life.