Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Cheat Sheet

cc.storyfox.cz

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 215 posts

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#61

Post by airstrike »

phasE89 wrote: post #2

I use Claude Code daily but kept forgetting commands, so I had Claude research every feature from the docs and GitHub, then generate a printable A4 landscape HTML page covering keyboard shortcuts, slash commands, workflows, skills system, memory/CLAUDE.md, MCP setup, CLI flags, and config files. It's a single HTML file - Claude wrote it and I iterated on the layout. A daily cron job checks the changelog and updates t…

FYI in US Letter Size it fits into a perfect 1 page...and a blank 2nd page. at least here on macOS firefox

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#64

Post by dataviz1000 »

the__alchemist wrote: post #54
dataviz1000 wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question "what would you do different?". After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself…

Let us perform a thought experiment. You do this. Many others, enthusiastic about both LLMs, and stocks/options, have similar ideas. Do these trading strategies interfere with each other? Does this group of people leveraging Claude for trading end up doing better in the market than those not? What are your benchmarks for success, say, a year into it? Do you have a specific edge in mind which you can leverage, that ot…

I've fully aware of this. If I thought there was any profit to be made, I would never mention it.

Now what is important is developing techniques for detecting patterns as this can applied to research, science, and medicine.

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#65

Post by dataviz1000 »

komali2 wrote: post #52
dataviz1000 wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://massive.com/docs/flat-files/quickstart I use TimescaleDB which is fast with the compression. People say there are better but I don’t think I can fit another year of data on my disk drive either or

Compression doesn't really explain the whole picture... Where'd you get the data itself? You sense I suppose everyone's skepticism here.

I linked to the source of the data.

I don't understand your question? Are you saying the source of the data I linked to is corrupt or lies? Should I be concerned they are selling me false data?

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#67

Post by dataviz1000 »

TacticalCoder wrote: post #49
dataviz1000 wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question "what would you do different?". After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself…

> Next I'm going to set it loose on 263 GB database of every stock quote and options trade in the past 4 years. Options quotes alone for US equities (or things that trades as such, like ADS/ADR) represent 40 Gbit per second during options trading hours. There are more than 60 million trades (not quotes, only trades) per day. As the stock market is opened approx 250 days per year (a bit more), that's more than 60 bill…

I see, I said "stock quote" instead of "minute aggregates". You are correct that data set is much larger and at ~1.5TB a year [0] I did not download 6TB of data onto my laptop. Every settled trade options or stocks isn't that big.

[0] https://massive.com/docs/flat-files/stocks/quotes

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#68

Post by taejavu »

artyom wrote: post #56

Wait, why do we need chat sheets for this like it's (gasp!) a programming language, tool or IDE? it's almost like if the thing is not intelligent at all and just another abstraction on top of what we already had.

C is "just another abstraction on top of what we already had" (Assembly). Doesn't mean it's not useful
Post reply on HN