61–70 of 171 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They've partnered with Motorola to have it preinstalled on phones, this is in TFA.
Preinstalled devices is not the main goal of the partnership. GOS is ok without having that to start. Motorolas stock OS will still be available.
Unfortunately it’s not enough because there’s also a need to work to get the laws repealed AND stop the endless attempts to bring them back.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's an interesting topic. Please, elaborate.
Western surveillance tech is superior because it gives you the option to choose your gender on a fluid scale when they're vacuuming your private data, whereas backwards eastern tech limits you to only male or female.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sure noone in the legal system of California would notice that trick!
Well correct me if I'm wrong but dumb laws are usually not written by people who know much shit about fuck. So it's entirely possible they wouldn't.
Society (mostly) works because we all agree that laws have intents. The wording is crafted as best as possible, and for the rest we have judges to shutdown lawyers trying to be a moffkalast smart asses.
In the meantime systemd already added handling for Age to the system bus. Next step is to add your race, then income, then who you voted for...
Systemd shouldn't be foisting this nonsense on Linux users however. I suppose the anti-systemd subset of the Linux community was proven right after all, this is the kind of issue that can end up facing when a huge piece of opinionated software like systemd more or less becomes an indispensable part of Linux.
The GrapheneOS Mastodon post says, "GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification or an account." https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116261301913660830 That raises the issues that GrapheneOS needs to solve, which may require more creativity than bold, somtimes combative statements. If GrapheneOS doesn't comply with laws and regulations then they wil…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Western surveillance tech is superior because it gives you the option to choose your gender on a fluid scale when they're vacuuming your private data, whereas backwards eastern tech limits you to only male or female.
What about not asking for gender when gender is completely irrelevant to the thing that the user is trying to do?