Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft stopped manufacturing in 2020. It was not hacked in its lifetime.
I agree, but also find it funny that by that standard the DRM in the original Google video streaming product was not hacked before the service was shutdown, after about 2 years :)
Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
61–70 of 311 posts
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
> assuming they continue making Xbox It sounds like that's the plan: https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/03/11/project-helix-buildin...
The new Xbox is going to be a specialized PC running Windows with full access to third party game stores (Steam, Epic, etc). It won't need to be "hacked" because anyone will already be able to run any software they want on it.
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#63This is great news. Hopefully this opens the floodgates towards emulation and homebrew. Not that there are really any exclusives, but it would be interesting.
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#64> Whether PC users, our core readership, will be interested in actually emulating Xbox One, looks unlikely. The 2013 system’s game library is largely overlapped in better quality on the PC platform. And this explains why it's stayed unhacked so long. There was very little incentive to hack the system when the games are all playable on a PC. Pirates, cheaters, archivists, and hackers could just go there. Microsoft's b…
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft released a video that covers effectively all of the Xbox One security system, and it's referred to extensively in the talk. The specific methods of glitching don't require any insider knowledge.
They also told everyone they added more anti glitching to later hardware revisions; which by the process of elimination tells everyone they thought this was possible. The whole initiative was a success when it gave them a year; an unqualified triumph when it gave them the whole generation; they really are not going to be to sad after 12 years.
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could a chip detect this and reset?
Yes, and the Xbox One has mechanisms to do just that. But they turned out to not be fully sufficient.
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#67This just again shows that given enough time skill, and resources, any security is pointless if the attacker has physical access to the device.
This console went completely unhacked for 12 years, with this coming a solid 4 years after the hardware was discontinued. They kept piracy off the console for its whole lifespan, which was the entire point of these security measures. This is a massive success for the Xbox security team.
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#68This just again shows that given enough time skill, and resources, any security is pointless if the attacker has physical access to the device.
I think this might be a good example of the fundamental misunderstanding of what "security" even is. It is never a binary state. Never was. And I think a lot of people don't really grok that and think that if a security block can be overcome in some manner then the thing is not secure . Eventually Fort Knox will succumb to the unrelenting arrow of time and some future visitors will simply step over the crumbling wall…
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
The new Xbox is going to be a specialized PC running Windows with full access to third party game stores (Steam, Epic, etc). It won't need to be "hacked" because anyone will already be able to run any software they want on it.
What is the point of a device like this if the only difference is form factor? Why wouldn't someone just buy a pre-configured gaming PC?
Re: Microsoft's 'unhackable' Xbox One has been hacked by 'Bliss'
#70This just again shows that given enough time skill, and resources, any security is pointless if the attacker has physical access to the device.