Live data from Hacker News

Leviathan (1651)

gutenberg.org

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Leviathan (1651)

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Such elegance, or snobbery or at least some kind of beauty... Using "&" literally in 2026 smells of wonder, well done, thanks! Do you do it sometimes in regular English words too or just in &c? Please give more examples (if you have any). This will be a great day, starting of like this: a written play with words; i like it!

&c as an abbreviation for etc was very common historically. For example, look at the OP. It would not normally be used for an et that is not the latin et (and), as in et cetera. Its use for an 'and' in latin carried over to english, for some reason, and that usage has stayed with us.

It’s hard to see but & is literally an e and a t conjoined. Not a ligature exactly

Re: Leviathan (1651)

#62
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

&c as an abbreviation for etc was very common historically. For example, look at the OP. It would not normally be used for an et that is not the latin et (and), as in et cetera. Its use for an 'and' in latin carried over to english, for some reason, and that usage has stayed with us.

It’s hard to see but & is literally an e and a t conjoined. Not a ligature exactly

It is easier to see in other fonts, but yes, I am aware of that. However as far as I am aware, it was never used to join an e and t that were not the latin et.

Re: Leviathan (1651)

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't it make more sense to want less government and more freedom if one doesn't trust people?

Imagine you grow up in a pedo cult and one day black vans drive on the ranch with FBI agents. Government bad is such an insufferable American take and I scream every time I hear it.

The black vans with federal agents that are snatching people from the streets and killing those that are opposing them pacifically surely scream of government good.
Post reply on HN