Live data from Hacker News

Personal Computer by Perplexity

perplexity.ai

61–70 of 187 posts

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#61
post #43

Wow they designed a computer I don’t want

> Personal Computer runs on a dedicated Mac mini that can run 24/7, connected to your local apps and Perplexity’s secure servers. https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/blog/everything-is-computer They designed a program (copied OpenClaw) and called it a computer

Yea, but since they link to a page where they describe openclaw as “malware reading your text messages” I’m assuming they like to think of this as something more evolved

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#64
post #32

From the blog post ( https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/blog/everything-is-computer ) >Personal Computer runs on a dedicated Mac mini that can run 24/7, connected to your local apps and Perplexity’s secure servers.

Ohhh so it’s just openclaw. Innovative.

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#65
post #36

> In a study of over 16,000 queries, measured against institutional benchmarks from McKinsey, Harvard, MIT, BCG, and others, we determined Perplexity Computer saved our internal teams $1.6M in labor costs and performed 3.25 years of work in only four weeks. And now we’re extending those same capabilities to other teams. This is a wild statement that does not seem to be supported by any actual data. What does it mean?…

When I'm running a lot of model training workflows concurrently, I can spend a small but noticeable amount of my day just clicking through links to see current progress and logs of any errors. If an AI would be capable of understanding the relatively complex UI, at least enough to find the right links to click, it could make a status report that takes me 15 seconds to read, and from that alone would save $2000 of labor annually.

I think their numbers of $1.6M and 3.25 years is still probably a massive overestimate, but the order of magnitude seems plausible.

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#66

Who in their right mind is going to blindly trust an AI like that? There wasn't any review of the numbers, or even a hint of a "sniff test" on the output of the AI? Would a real person risk their reputation like that? -- With regard to the attempted redefinition of a commonly used term, I'm reminded of Gretchen, from the Mean Girls, trying to redefine "Fetch!"[1] It's just not going to happen. [1] https://www.imdb.co…

> Who in their right mind is going to blindly trust an AI like that?

… particularly with acts that have legal implications like … well, almost everything, but particularly communication with investors or board members.

If people can get slides or summaries by pushing a button, they don't need others to push the button for them.

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What does this mean? The computer isn't alive. But they want you to think of it as alive. They're anthropomorphizing it.

If you stop paying this subscription, this living computer with the googly puppy eyes gets it . You wouldn't want anything bad to happen to your best friend, would you? soft whimpering sounds

[dead]

Re: Personal Computer by Perplexity

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you feel the same about AWS?

Personally - yes. They may not come after all the niche companies, but they definitely come after the most successful markets, especially those with low effort moats. Same goes for relying on the Apple/Google app stores (ex - Apple literally got slapped in court for copying successful apps and then pushing their offering to the top of their stores... talk about wildly abusive behavior). I may still choose to use AWS/…

Amazon do absolutely the same, they just rip off products with best margin and lowest effort and start them reselling themselves.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/amazon-i...

Post reply on HN