Pentagon chief blocks officers from Ivy League schools and top universities

If you haven’t been paying attention, the elite have give up on that lie. They know it’s indefensible to even the dumbest Americans anymore.

Additionally the risk is over. The American people are so disgustingly impotent, they no longer need to placate them with lies of meritocracy and other false values. They can now transparently tell you “we will rule you as we wish and face no consequences”. The Epstein saga solidifies this.

In federal jobs (civilian and service) in order to climb up the leadership track you need to take part in professional development courses.

A bunch of universities set up 10 month long fellowship and educational programs that would give these leadership track individuals some additional academic polish, teach them new skills, and allow them to network with private sector and other public sector leadership track individuals.

Anyone who has worked in the Federal Government

---

> Given that whatever nexus this is seems to attract VVIP's of multiple countries

No, that's just an American private school undergad thing.

China's Harvard and Yale is Harvard and Yale because they were the first programs to conduct mass outreach in China after Mao was toppled.

The Gulf's Ivies (other than the Ivies) is Georgetown and CMU because both GTown and CMU did a massive outreach ans brand positioning campaign in the Gulf.

The reality is, most decisionmakers (not political appointees) in the US actually did their undergrad at state flagships like UMich, UNC, and ASU or beltway schools and only ended up at an Ivy for grad school - as is the norm in the private sector.

In countries like China or much of the Gulf, brand name matters as it helps with climbing the ladder in those countries and it gives mobility that a domestic degree couldn't provide aside from at a handful of institutions. It's much easier to get into Harvard for an undergrad than to do the Gaokao to get into Tsinghua, and a Harvard degree gives you the ability to get expedited naturalization in Japan and much of Europe.

> Like are they all history majors? Political science majors?

Primarily Engineering (especially IEOR, ECE, MechE, and Aerospace), CS, and PoliSci. I myself was a double major in CS (specialized in systems) and PoliSci and spent a minor stint in grad school and

> it would be interesting to understand what institutional lever in society these folks are preparing to grip

At least in the US, it's just standard corporate management kinda work. The reality is, governments operate the same way that corporations do - you get "big picture" types (political appointees like most cabinet members in every institution) who are the public face for an organization, but the actual decisionmaking and strategy setting is done by careerists who are managing upwards.

Institutional inertia always wins (eg. It's why Obama's red line on Syrian chemical weapons was ignored by the DoD and why Trump's interventionist policy shifted to what it is today), and the reality is a lot of conflicts that have been bubbling in the background for decades are now reaching their precipice.

I know I didn't fully answer your question but it's a fairly complex question that I'm not sure I can fully do justice in a comment.

It's best to view shifts within the USG the same way you would see shifts in a large conglomerate like Pfizer or at a large R1 research institution like a UC Berkeley.

I had to Google-AI & Gemini up some possible solutions to

"TFed and CAed for SSC fellows" Gemini only got the SSC plausibly correct - is it "SSC Fellows: Refers to Senior Service College Fellows, typically senior military officers or high-level civilians (such as those in the DAU-SSCF program) who participate in prestigious leadership development and strategic research programs at various institutions" (top source: Army War College, Senior Service College fellows program)

Would you consider yourself or your career-track natsec-adjacent / military-adjacent?

Google Search AI seemed to do better on the other acronyms: TFed: This is almost certainly shorthand for "Teaching Fellow" (TF) + "Education/Training." Context: A "Teaching Fellow" supports professors in higher education by leading discussions, grading, or mentoring undergraduate students. Meaning: The person has trained or mentored Teaching Fellows. CAEd: This likely refers to a parallel, specialized form of training for the fellows. Possible meaning 1: Course Advising/Education (helping TFs with their specific courses). Possible meaning 2: Career Advising/Education (helping TFs develop their professional skills). Context: Similar to how "Didactic Fellows" are trained to mentor peers in teaching skills. SSC Fellows [I suspect it choked on this one]: These are the recipients of the training. They are likely participants in a fellowship program (e.g., Summer Service/Studies Course, Special Subject Course) in a formal education context

TF = Teaching Fellow, CA = Course Advisor?

PS Do you find it odd that someone might feel it necessary to AI-up solutions to your acronyms in an effort to better understand where you're coming from?