Live data from Hacker News

Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

economist.com

61–70 of 163 posts

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

There is a book “Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible” which you might want to consider before deciding truth doesn’t matter anymore. It describes an explicit strategy by the Kremlin to poison the information landscape with lies, half truths, and conspiracies. And amplify conflicting narratives. Eventually people stop caring about what is true anymore.

nixosbestos’s comment was in response to a post about how an arbitrary brand new conspiracy theory didn’t have compelling evidence in the emails. It seems like saying “who cares” to what kind of reads like “technically there’s an infinite amount of conspiracy theories that aren’t proven in the emails” is saying the opposite of “truth doesn’t matter”

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#62
There’s actually more, though the Justice Department is deleting them in real time. The Justice Department used the same filenames for pdfs and the source media so hours of surveillance video from Epstein’s last days in custody was available as well as videos from all his devices including censored child porn with some of the other pedophiles unredacted. https://old.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1qx81dj/type_this_...

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#63

Honestly I’ve been sick to my stomach these past few days. I wasn’t even looking for the files and saw some in my feed on Reddit. Basically take the most sad and disturbing Eastern European horror and put it in email form. I had to stop my Seinfeld rewatch because I saw one email were he just happened to be boating by and stopped by the island for lemonade. The richest people and political elite were openly trading p…

> were

Happening before JE, happening now.

Jimmy Savile, same thing.

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#64

I have a lot of sympathy for this man: https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/bio/e/jeffery-epstein

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/29/geoffrey-epstein-is...

The outlier where name recognition on the ballot is not an advantage?

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#66
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pam Bondi said if the DOJ went after everyone the whole system would collapse is why.

She is more worried about her own exposure. She can picture the ship sinking but doesn't want to drown with the other rats she helped protect.

She’s won so far, already got away with this twice as Florida AG, didn’t try to go after Epstein when he lived there and after Trump donated 25000 to her, she stopped the prosecution of his TrumpU fraud in Florida. GOP owns Justice Department for three more years and Dems were pretty toothless in previous administration.

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#67
post #59
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pam Bondi said if the DOJ went after everyone the whole system would collapse is why.

> the whole system If there were democrats on that list, they’d already be in jail.

THERE ARE! BILL CLINTON! NOAM CHOMSKY (if they'd acted faster they could have nabbed him before he died!)

Democrats WANT to see the pedos in our party getting justice! We have no loyalty to our party. We are the party of purity testing and infighting.

Anthony Weiner went down quickly. Cuomo went down quickly. Even folks who didn't deserve it like Al Franken go down quickly!

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#69
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the whole system If there were democrats on that list, they’d already be in jail.

THERE ARE! BILL CLINTON! NOAM CHOMSKY (if they'd acted faster they could have nabbed him before he died!) Democrats WANT to see the pedos in our party getting justice! We have no loyalty to our party. We are the party of purity testing and infighting. Anthony Weiner went down quickly. Cuomo went down quickly. Even folks who didn't deserve it like Al Franken go down quickly!

> We have no loyalty to our party. We are the party of purity testing and infighting.

Or as the rest of the world calls it, “not being a criminal organization”.

Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal

#70
post #2

Jack Blanchard in the Politico podcast (almost as good as Odd Lots if you're fine with listening to stuff at 2x speed on commutes) remarked that one of the most important aspects of the response to the publicization of the first 2% of the Epstein Files is that it may be a watershed moment where the better parts of citizen journalism have become completely competitive with institutional journalism, due heavily to the…

Institutional journalism has done everything in its power to kill this story for 7 years. You don't need a fast turnaround time when the fourth estate is also busy protecting the wealthy. Note how we have all the goods on Matt Gaetz and everyone just conveniently forgot about him because daddy knows who to buy off. DOJ has all the time to pursue rinky dink charges against Letitia James for what would be at best a los…

The degree to which this is true is I think still underestimated, and comments like these need more upvotes.

You don’t need to appeal to shadowy cabals to explain why media professionals have been desperate for this stuff to not be true (and why, every day these days, you can still read examples of them absolutely writhing as they are obliged by public outrage to continue to report on it).

All you really need is to remember that a) they have mortgages to pay, too, so why rock the boat, and b) the people who end up writing for the WSJ and the people who end up in Jeffrey’s rolodex are by and large the same class of people. They went to the same colleges, they consume similar culture and media, they play the same games of keep up with the joneses, they read the Economist on their days off and fret over Gen Z slang and wonder whether the Chase card or the Amex will get them enough airline miles to fly to London for free with their spouse etc etc. They recognize themselves in the “Epstein class” — not in their crimes, but in their manners. So why would they be party to showing the world that class is so profoundly rotten? It’d give the lie to their whole lifestyle.

(And yes, to anticipate a critique here, of course there’s a difference between a producer at NBC and a billionaire! Not denying that. But they are cut from the exact same cultural and social cloth. The best proof of this is in the Epstein files themselves: not in the creepy or criminal bits, but in the mundane stuff. How he talks, what’s on his mind, the advice he gives, etc. It’s all American upper middle class humdrum stuff.)

Post reply on HN