Live data from Hacker News

Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

threads.com

61–70 of 210 posts

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#61

Rather than linking to a threads post that is a screenshot of the x.com post with little to no commentary, we should be linking to the original x.com post https://x.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622

for fucks sakes, don’t link twitter

Use nitter or xcancel

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#62

I'm not the first to point this out but the website in question, which is mostly static, could easily be hosted on a VPS for at most a couple hundred dollars a month.

Directly to CDN. Put it in a CloudFront distribution and it would be a fraction of a fraction of that Vercel bill.

Remember kids, they're incentivized to get you to build something to burn as much compute as possible.

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#63
post #12

1) Covering the ~$50k hosting bill for Jmail on Vercel sounds generous, but a self-hosted VPS on Hetzner could serve the same purpose for ~€30/month, which is orders of magnitude cheaper and avoids vendor lock-in. 2) This comes as the CEO of Vercel, Guillermo Rauch, is already facing community backlash for publicly supporting Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, a move that’s led to boycotts and migrations off the platf…

[deleted]

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#64
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$50k and €30 are of the same order of magnitude.

This is offtopic honestly, but I'm curious if I've been using this phrase wrong for my whole life. Doesn't "order of magnitude" refer to steps of powers of ten? $50000 vs €30. (or €42066.30 vs €30 if I normalize the currency) 5x10^4 vs 3x10^1.

You have it right, perhaps the original poster was referring to it in a more colloquial manner, in the sense that against 200 million in revenue, 50,000 and 30 are in the same ballpark?

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#65
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you really think a $30 hetzner host can sustain that level of traffic performantly? Don't get me wrong, I love hetzner, but I would be very surprised if the numbers work out there.

Lol yes? It's all reads. If it can all fit in ram, great. Otherwise an SSD will do fine too.

You could probably serve it from the quad-core ARM64 inside the SSD controller, if you were trying "for the lulz".

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#66
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A laptop would have a hard time serve thousands of people hitting a single endpoint multiple times a day.

With a 2025 tech stack, yes. With a 2005 tech stack, no. Don't use any containers, no[/limited] server-side dynamic script languages, no microservices or anything like that. Considering the content is essentially static, this is actually viable. Search functions might be a bit problematic, but that's a solvable problem. Of course you pay with engineering skills and resources.

Is there any feasible way to implement search client-side on a database of this scale?

I guess you would need some sort of search term to document id mapping that gets downloaded to the browser but maybe there's something more efficient than trying to figure out what everyone might be searching for in advance?

And how would you do searching for phrases or substrings? I've no idea if that's doable without having a database server-side that has the whole document store to search through.

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#67
post #17
post #12

1) Covering the ~$50k hosting bill for Jmail on Vercel sounds generous, but a self-hosted VPS on Hetzner could serve the same purpose for ~€30/month, which is orders of magnitude cheaper and avoids vendor lock-in. 2) This comes as the CEO of Vercel, Guillermo Rauch, is already facing community backlash for publicly supporting Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, a move that’s led to boycotts and migrations off the platf…

Do you really think a $30 hetzner host can sustain that level of traffic performantly? Don't get me wrong, I love hetzner, but I would be very surprised if the numbers work out there.

I would use a $100/mo box with a much better CPU and more RAM, but I think the pinch point might be the 1Gbps unmetered networking that Hetzner provide.

They will sell you a 10Gbps uplink however, with (very reasonably priced) metered bandwidth.

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#68
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No . Hetzner would terminate your server as you are not a profitable customer.

A profitable customer? How would Hetzner know if you're profitable or not? I've hosted side projects on Hetzner for years and have never experienced anything like that. Do you have any references of projects to which it happened?

Because you are using an incredibly large amount of bandwidth for €30 a month.

They offer unlimited bandwidth with their dedicated servers under a “fair usage” policy.

The bandwidth costs would be higher than what you pay monthly, so they would simply drop you.

You are probably using very little bandwidth, so it doesn’t matter in your case.

However, I assume Jmail consumes a very large amount of bandwidth.

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#69
The post said 450 million pageviews, likely since November. If we make very generous assumptions and assume that each pageview is a megabyte (very generous based on my own experience scanning billions of websites), then that's 450TB total in traffic. If you really did 450TB per month in traffic, you would need slightly more than one gigabit line (and hence VPS), but not more than two. With Hetzner the traffic would cost you €450 or $535.

Did I get something wrong?

Re: Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'

#70
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No . Hetzner would terminate your server as you are not a profitable customer.

I have heard of hetzner terminating customer relationships if too many legal complaints are filed against your VPSes. But not because of being "not a profitable customer". Mind sharing some links here?

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/180504/hetzner-traffic-use...
Post reply on HN