61–70 of 198 posts
It took the man o war, but crossed out Jellyfish and said "added a vaguer term", but a jellyfish and a man-o-war are discrete animals.
The man-o-war is a colonial siphonophore composed of zooids, while a jellyfish is a singular marine organism.
They're both in the phylum Cnidaria, and that would have been a more vague term had I entered it.
not a great strat, though. (tons repeated animals)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There must be another table. I got "Are you Australian?" for "dingo" and for "cicada" "don't you love their songs?" edit: https://rose.systems/animalist/eggs.js
Hmm, what's this one? var h = hash(guess); if (h==7182294905658010 || h==6344346315172974) { return "Adorable guess, but it's spelled “rosy”."; } I'm guessing they're hashes for " rosie" or " rosey", but what?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Similarly, it insisted to me that a pigeon is the same thing as a mourning dove. Not true! But your case is even more egregious.
"pigeon" and "dove" are both words for the same family of birds. The bird most people think of with the word "pigeon" is the rock dove ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_dove ) or domesticated / feral variants of it.
30 animals listed 𓃱 𓃸
Edit: weird... emojis don't work here? how have I never known this...
66 animals listed 𓃬𓃰
One of the few sites with a fun "you have javascript turned off" message. > This game requires JavaScript. Or, if you've superior taste, take out a pen and paper and start listing animals.
Fun results: outputted as emoji 30 animals listed 𓃱 𓃸 Edit: weird... emojis don't work here? how have I never known this...
I added Jellyfish and then Portuguese Man-o-war. It took the man o war, but crossed out Jellyfish and said "added a vaguer term", but a jellyfish and a man-o-war are discrete animals. The man-o-war is a colonial siphonophore composed of zooids, while a jellyfish is a singular marine organism. They're both in the phylum Cnidaria, and that would have been a more vague term had I entered it.
I added bobcat, then lynx, and it would not accept lynx because bobcat was there.
Oh, and, 77, just woke up. No coffee.
It might be an interesting LLM benchmark: how many can they list without breaking the rules (repetition or non-animals). Although I bet that big bucks would be then thrown at pointlessly optimizing for that benchmark, so...
Might be an interesting problem for understanding how various models perform recollection of prior tokens within the context window. I'm sure they could list animals until their window is full but what I'm not sure of is how much of the window they could fill without repeating.