61–70 of 387 posts
Zuck thinks we're "dumb fucks". That's his internet legacy. Copying products, buying them up, wiping out competition
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Any large scale provider with headquarters in the USA will be subject to backdoors and information sharing with the government when they want to read or know what you are doing. Not just the USA. This is basically universal.
It's not guaranteed or by default. This type of generalized defeatism does more harm than not.
Nation state governments do have the ability to coerce companies within their territory by default.
If you think this feature is unique to the USA, you are buying too much into a separate narrative. All countries can and will use the force of law to control companies within their borders when they see fit. The USA actually has more freedom and protections in this area than many countries, even though it’s far from perfect.
> This type of generalized defeatism does more harm than not.
Pointing out the realities of the world and how governments work isn’t defeatism.
Believing that the USA is uniquely bad and closing your eyes to how other countries work is more harmful than helpful.
Who do they expect to fall for the claims that a Facebook owned messenger couldn't read your "encrypted" messages? It's truly funny. Any large scale provider with headquarters in the USA will be subject to backdoors and information sharing with the government when they want to read or know what you are doing.
Who do they expect to fall for the claims that a Facebook owned messenger couldn't read your "encrypted" messages? It's truly funny. Any large scale provider with headquarters in the USA will be subject to backdoors and information sharing with the government when they want to read or know what you are doing.
Thats just wrong. Signal for example is headquartered in the US and does not even have this capability (besides metadata)
yes, this is a very known fact that it is not E2EE but Client2Server Encrypted. Otherwise your message history wouldn't work.
Might be a rookie question. But exactly why would chat history not work?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal uses the DRM APIs to mitigate threats like Microsoft Recall, but it doesn't stop the app itself from reading its own data. I don't really see how it's possible to mitigate client compromise. You can decrypt stuff on a secure enclave but at some point the client has to pull it out and render it.
> don't really see how it's possible to mitigate client compromise. Think of the way DRM'ed video is played. If the media player application is compromised, the video data is still secure. Thats because the GPU does both the decryption and rendering, and will not let the application read it back.
You could put the entire app within TrustZone, but then you're not trusting the app vendor any less than you were before.
Anyone trusting Facebook to follow basic human decency and, yes, laws, is a fool.
They got caught torrenting unbelievable amounts of content, an act that committed even just a few times can get my home Internet shut down with no recourse (best outcome). Literally nothing happened. Combine the fact that nothing legally significant ever happens to them with zuckerburg’s colossal ego and complete lack of ethical foundation, and you have quite the recipe. And I’m not even getting into the obvious nega…
The true wealthy live by an entirely different set of rules than the rest of us, especially when they are willing to prostrate themselves to the US President.
This has always been true to some degree, but is both more true than ever (there used to be some limits based on accepted decorum) plus they just dont even try to hide it anymore.
Who do they expect to fall for the claims that a Facebook owned messenger couldn't read your "encrypted" messages? It's truly funny. Any large scale provider with headquarters in the USA will be subject to backdoors and information sharing with the government when they want to read or know what you are doing.
Me? I'd be very surprised if they can actually read encrypted messages (without pushing a malicious client update). The odds that no one at Meta would blow the whistle seem low, and a backdoor would likely be discovered by independent security researchers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal uses the DRM APIs to mitigate threats like Microsoft Recall, but it doesn't stop the app itself from reading its own data. I don't really see how it's possible to mitigate client compromise. You can decrypt stuff on a secure enclave but at some point the client has to pull it out and render it.
> don't really see how it's possible to mitigate client compromise. Think of the way DRM'ed video is played. If the media player application is compromised, the video data is still secure. Thats because the GPU does both the decryption and rendering, and will not let the application read it back.