Live data from Hacker News

The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

popularmechanics.com

61–70 of 331 posts

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#61

I'm in favor of tighter regulation on drone imports, both for national security reasons and to try to jumpstart a US drone industry. Not allowing _any_ foreign made components, however, is insane, as is not even auditing DJI when they didn't put up a fight. They have to know they're just killing the small drone industry completely.

> CTO & Co-Founder, GovHawk.

Checks out. More legislation boosts your business.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#63
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

>You can't take one tragic mistake or bad-apple cop and draw conclusions When have Trump's administration ever suggested it was either? So far they have said: -it was an act of self-defense by Ross -Ms. Good ran over Ross -Ross has immunity even if he committed murder -Ms. Good was very disrespectful to law enforcement

[deleted]

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#64
post #2

Seeing how drone warfare has become the new hot front in 21st century conflicts like Ukraine, it's hard not to speculate on the implications of this as political unrest continues to rise in the U.S. It's no secret that the current U.S. regime views a sizeable portion of its own civilian citizens as enemy combatants. They are already shooting people in the face and not even putting up a pretense of acting shocked at t…

Agreed. They can’t control the narrative if journalists and activists can observe brutal state violence against citizens with their pocket drones. I picked up an older DJI model in December and am super glad I did with recent events.

Well, they can and they do. The core supporters just watch Fox where none of that ever shows up.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#65
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hint: the current democrat establishment is also authoritarian. you're so, so close to it!

Whataboutism fail.

The claims of whataboutism to shut down any comparison are getting mine numbingly old.

Particularly in cases like this which are simply continuing discussion on the existing subjects of the discussion.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#66
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

>You can't take one tragic mistake or bad-apple cop and draw conclusions When have Trump's administration ever suggested it was either? So far they have said: -it was an act of self-defense by Ross -Ms. Good ran over Ross -Ross has immunity even if he committed murder -Ms. Good was very disrespectful to law enforcement

And anyone who has seen more than just the one the video the Trump administration wanted everyone to see knows the Trump admin is lying though their teeth.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#67
post #2

Seeing how drone warfare has become the new hot front in 21st century conflicts like Ukraine, it's hard not to speculate on the implications of this as political unrest continues to rise in the U.S. It's no secret that the current U.S. regime views a sizeable portion of its own civilian citizens as enemy combatants. They are already shooting people in the face and not even putting up a pretense of acting shocked at t…

Ah yes I'm sure it has nothing to do with the drones running closed proprietary software via OTA updates, with encrypted data connections back to China, while being outfitted with 8k cameras, gps, lidar, etc.

Reading the article, it actually doesn't. Many US-made drones are also banned.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#68
post #2

Seeing how drone warfare has become the new hot front in 21st century conflicts like Ukraine, it's hard not to speculate on the implications of this as political unrest continues to rise in the U.S. It's no secret that the current U.S. regime views a sizeable portion of its own civilian citizens as enemy combatants. They are already shooting people in the face and not even putting up a pretense of acting shocked at t…

Trump will be gone in 3 years. Maybe fewer depending on his health. It's unlikely that this change will have any meaningful effect on US democracy. On the other hand, little drones are effectively munitions now. That means drone manufacturing capacity is effectively munitions manufacturing capacity. We're giving potential adversaries economies of scale building things that may be used to kill us. I'm generally a pret…

I don’t know if we should be so sure that he will be gone in three years. There is no incentive for him to relinquish control peacefully. We’ll have to give him a plea bargain, or a pardon of sorts, to incentivise him stepping down. Without one his back will be against a wall (or iron bars in this case), and he will gladly escalate to stay in power to avoid incarceration.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#69
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Source? Tfa says only new models of drones are banned.

You're correct. The ban targets the supply chain and future imports/sales, not retroactive possession. New foreign drones cannot be certified for sale in the US market going forward. Existing drones you already own aren't being confiscated or made illegal to fly

For now. FCC could change this in a couple of months. There is talk of canceling FCC certifications for Autel/DJI.

Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones

#70
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trump will be gone in 3 years. Maybe fewer depending on his health. It's unlikely that this change will have any meaningful effect on US democracy. On the other hand, little drones are effectively munitions now. That means drone manufacturing capacity is effectively munitions manufacturing capacity. We're giving potential adversaries economies of scale building things that may be used to kill us. I'm generally a pret…

That logic also means they shouldn't be banned under 2nd amendment protections, no?

No, you can think of them more like unarmed artillery shells. Can you walk down the street to buy some artillery munitions?

Even if they were considered arms for the purpose of 2a this isn’t a ban on drones but a specific manufacturer. They government can definitely refuse to grant a manufacturer license to sell on this country.

Post reply on HN