Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT Image 1.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 272 posts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#61

Post by jibal »

nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53
oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

facetious

[I won't bother responding to the rest of your appalling comment]

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#63

Post by KaiserPro »

sharkjacobs wrote: post #8

Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?

Meta's codec avatars all have a green cast because they spent millions on the rig to capture whole bodies and even more on rolling it out to get loads of real data.

They forgot to calibrate the cameras, so everything had a green tint.

Meanwhile all the other teams had a billion macbeth charts lying around just in case.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#64

Post by niklassheth »

vunderba wrote: post #5
minimaxir wrote: post #4

I have a Nano Banana Pro blog post in the works expanding on my experiments with Nano Banana ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45917875 ). Running a few of my test cases from that post and the upcoming blog post through this new ChatGPT Image model, this new model is better than Nano Banana but MUCH worse than Nano Banana Pro which now nails the test cases that previously showed issues. The pricing is unclear bu…

I'll be running gpt-image-1.5 through my GenAI Showdown later today, but in the meantime if you want to see some legitimately impressive NB Pro outputs, check out: https://mordenstar.com/blog/edits-with-nanobanana In particular, NB Pro successfully assembled a jigsaw puzzle it had never seen before, generated semi-accurate 3D topographical extrapolations, and even swapped a window out for a mirror.

Nice! Your comparison site is probably the best one out there for image models

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#65

Post by illwrks »

nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53
oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

The issue is ownership, not promotion or visibility.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#66

Post by huflungdung »

nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53
oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

[dead]

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#67

Post by huflungdung »

jibal wrote: post #61
nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

facetious [I won't bother responding to the rest of your appalling comment]

[dead]

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#68

Post by BoorishBears »

netule wrote: post #58
nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

Suddenly, copyright doesn't matter anymore when it's no longer useful to the narrative.

OpenAI does care about copyright, thankfully China does not: https://imgur.com/a/RKxYIyi

(to clarify, OpenAI stops refining the image if a classifier detects your image as potentially violating certain copyrights. Although the gulf in resolution is not caused by that.)

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#69

Post by gostsamo »

Alt text is one of the nicest uses for ai and still Open AI didn't bother using it for something so basic. The dogfooding is not strong with their marketing team.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#70

Post by zkmon »

AI-generated images would remove all the trust and admire for human talent in art, similar to how text-generation would remove trust and admire for human talent in writing. Same case for coding.

So, let's simulate that future. Since no one trusts your talent in coding, art or writing, you wouldn't care to do any of these. But the economy is built on the products and services which get their value based how much of human talent and effort is required to produce them.

So, the value of these services and products goes down as demand and trust goes down. No one knows or cares who is a good programmer in the team, who is great thinker and writer and who is a modern Picasso.

So, the motivation disappears for humans. There are no achievements to target, there is no way to impress others with your talent. This should lead to uniform workforce without much difference in talents. Pretty much a robot army.

Post reply on HN