Live data from Hacker News

$50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

planetscale.com

61–70 of 73 posts

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#61
post #48

If anyone from Planetscale is reading this, please know I hate what you did to your website. I previously had it bookmarked as an example of excellent, usable website design. About a year ago it turned into a plaintext nightmare. The first time I saw the new design I genuinely thought that a CSS file had failed to load in my browser. It's awful. *Edit:* It also fails to load other pages if you have JavaScript or XHR…

Design is subjective of course. I love their new website and much prefer it to the old one.

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#66
post #48

If anyone from Planetscale is reading this, please know I hate what you did to your website. I previously had it bookmarked as an example of excellent, usable website design. About a year ago it turned into a plaintext nightmare. The first time I saw the new design I genuinely thought that a CSS file had failed to load in my browser. It's awful. *Edit:* It also fails to load other pages if you have JavaScript or XHR…

Same. Love PlanetScale, love their previous website design. I struggle reading white text on black backgrounds, so I don't even try to read their product pages or blog posts since there's no light mode :( yes I know about reader mode It feels it went from "professional Stripe level design that you admire and it inspires you" to just "hard to read black website", not sure what for. (not fully functional) https://web.a…

There's definitely a light mode for planetscale.com (the docs, the blog, the changelog, and the UI). Should work on both desktop and mobile. Make sure your browser is requesting light mode. The browser doesn't always follow your OS-level preferences.

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#67
post #60
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had the same latency concerns when I heard about this PaaS DB trend, but you’ll note that this runs in the AWS (soon GCP) region of your choice, so if you’re hosted there, it should be about the same latency as using their managed DB service. If you aren’t hosting the app in the same AWS/GCP region then I still have the same question.

> so if you’re hosted there, it should be about the same latency as using their managed DB service. yes and no. In my AWS account I can explicitly pick an AZ (us-east-2a, us-east-2b or us-east-2c) but Availability Zones are not consistent between AWS accounts. See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ram/latest/userguide/working-wit...

But that's exactly why they introduced the AZ IDs (use1-az1 as opposed to us-east-1a), so you can tell whether you're really in the same zone, regardless of the name you see in a particular account.

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#68

Doesnt "Metal" infer you get the whole box to yourself? Curious if my definitions are different to others here because I don't get what's "Metal" about sharing an instance with others. You're still sharing nvme IO, cpu, memory bandwidth, etc. Not having a VM isn't really the point. (EDIT: and could have been done with non-metal aws instances with direct-attached nvme anyway)

I also think this naming is misleading - there is a very clear association with "bare metal", which is not what is being offered here

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#69
post #67
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> so if you’re hosted there, it should be about the same latency as using their managed DB service. yes and no. In my AWS account I can explicitly pick an AZ (us-east-2a, us-east-2b or us-east-2c) but Availability Zones are not consistent between AWS accounts. See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ram/latest/userguide/working-wit...

But that's exactly why they introduced the AZ IDs (use1-az1 as opposed to us-east-1a), so you can tell whether you're really in the same zone, regardless of the name you see in a particular account.

Ah, thanks Internet stranger. TIL.

Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres

#70
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On Hetzner you will be on the hook for managing the database though, and DBA is most certainly a full-time job if you have a serious use-case for it.

Considering they are charging an unfathomable $4529/mo for 256 GB databases, extrapolating that to a serious use case you can indeed just hire someone full-time with how much you'd save. And then you'll actually have someone who understands how databases work instead of treating it like an expensive black box. edit: my bad that's the price for 256GB RAM.

I think this product is mostly only viable in NA market where the SDE wage is much higher than European one to justify spending $x/mo for DBaaS instead of hosting their own
Post reply on HN