Live data from Hacker News

Taxing Growth

equitileconversations.com

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Taxing Growth

#61
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the reality is not so simple if that means taking a massive hit on 41% of our exports Is it actually 41%? Is it a massive hit? What is the economic impact of small trade frictions on a declining proportion of exports. The main reason for the decline is not Brexit, it is that the EU is a declining proportion of the world economy because Europe is the slowest growing region of the world. > This is the whole Brexit st…

In your strange haste to prove me wrong you have not taken the time to read my comment. Yes, currently 41% of UK exports go to the EU. The point is that we have a deal with the EU for access. But that might change. If we went low tax/low regs the EU may very well retaliate by putting barriers to trade with us. This would seriously hurt our exports (a "big hit"...). Hence, reality of being "free to do what we want" ou…

> The graph shows a decline

If you pick a time period over which that is true. That proves what exactly? European economies did badly in 2023?

> If we went low tax/low regs the EU may very well retaliate by putting barriers to trade with us.

The same applies to any free trade agreement, or exporting anywhere, as the US has recently proved.

The EU would also lose from higher trade barriers.

Re: Taxing Growth

#62
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That shows a decline compared to 2019: 35,193 in 2019, 35,108 in 2024. Overall GDP is up over the period because of population growth. All as per my original comment.

I am far more concerned that it is not meaningfully changed since 2007 - the year that iPhones came into existence.

we did have the financial crisis and covid in that time.

On the other hand, I think this chart shows a clear long term trend all the same: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?end=2...

Re: Taxing Growth

#63
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly as predicted you are now claiming that I am still wrong by picking a suitable timescale instead of discussing the point. As already said in another comment the graph does show a decline as 2024 is still below 2019, especially with a drop in 2023 (which corresponds to the highest annual population growth on record). I don't know why you are doing that (using narrowest possible interpretation of what I wrote to…

OK, so your claim of decline is true if you carefully pick the right timescale. I do not think that approach is reasonable. The UK economy (in common with other European economies) did badly in 2023 which proves what exactly?

I didn't pick a timescale, you did. I wrote that "the GDP per capita has been declining", which is has and you provided the graph that shows it. Obviously I meant currently/recently...

Again, what are you trying to achieve by attacking me so disingenuously?

Post reply on HN