This kind of thing annoys me. This is why CTFs are great, where the goal is to get the flag string. Obviously harder to do for sysadmin, but expecting a particular configuration when I managed to make it work without doing things exactly as they wanted is no better than a poorly written exam.
Advent of Sysadmin 2025
61–70 of 140 posts
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#62imagine typing in a terminal... you want to delete the previous word so press ctrl+w... actually you're in a browser; the window closes... :sadness:
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Roll 2d6, sum result. Your CI migration target is: 2. migrate secret manager. Roll again 3. cloud build 4. gocd 5. jenkins 6. gitlab 7. github actions 8. bamboo 9. codepipeline 10. buildbot 11. team foundation server 12. migrate version control. Roll again
somehow i am really liking the kind of people that comment in the comment sections of sysadmin posts. i wonder what personality type this is
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#64Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#65Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#66imagine typing in a terminal... you want to delete the previous word so press ctrl+w... actually you're in a browser; the window closes... :sadness:
hello, creator here, sorry about that. In this case you can click again on the "Open the Server Terminal in a New Window" button
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#67Here's 12 Sysadmin/DevOps (they're synonyms now!) challenges, straight from the day job: 1. Get a user to stop logging in as root. 2. Get all users to stop sharing the same login and password for all servers. 3. Get a user to upgrade their app's dependencies to versions newer than 2010. 4. Get a user to use configuration management rather than scp'ing config files from their laptop to the server. 5. Get a user to bak…
Is this really like that? Isn't there any Unix/DBA anymore? I associate DevOps to what at my time we called "operations" and "development". We had 5 teams or so:
1) Developers, who would architect and write code, 2) Operations who would deploy, monitor and address customer complaints, 3) Unix (aka SYS) administrators, who would take care of housekeeping of well, the OS (and web servers/middleware), 4) DBA who would be monitoring and optimizing Oracle/Postgres, and 5) Network admins, who would take care of Load Balancers, Routers, Switches, Firewalls (well, there were 2 security experts for that also)
So I think DevOps would be a mix of 1&2, to avoid the daily wars that would constantly happen "THEY did it wrong!"
Can somebody clear my mind, please!? It seems I was out of it for too long?!
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah I was thinking of using it for us actually. Connects to everything, lots of plugins, etc. I wonder what the hate is from, they are all pretty bad aren't they ? Will test forgejo's CI first as we'll use the repo anyway, but if it ain't for me, it's going to be jenkins I assume.
Cons: - DSL is harder to get into. - Hard to reproduce a setup unless builds are in DSL and Jenkins itself is in a fixed version container with everything stored in easily transferable bind volumes; config export/import isn't straightforward. - Builds tend to break in a really weird way when something (even external things like Gitea) updates. - I've had my setup broken once after updating Jenkins and not being able…
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#69Here's 12 Sysadmin/DevOps (they're synonyms now!) challenges, straight from the day job: 1. Get a user to stop logging in as root. 2. Get all users to stop sharing the same login and password for all servers. 3. Get a user to upgrade their app's dependencies to versions newer than 2010. 4. Get a user to use configuration management rather than scp'ing config files from their laptop to the server. 5. Get a user to bak…
It really depends if the machine is hosting anything that you don't want some users to access. If the machine is single-purpose and any user is already able to access everything valuable from it (DB with customer data, etc) or trivially elevate to root (via sudo, docker access, etc) then it's just pointless extra typing and security theatre.
Re: Advent of Sysadmin 2025
#70It seems it's called SRE nowadays right? I hate how things keep being renamed for no reason other than making more buzzwords for suits.