Live data from Hacker News

GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

eldred.fr

61–70 of 140 posts

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#61

Are there any alternatives to Github that offer similar bang for the buck? Particularly for very small teams or solo devs that need private repos? The author here specifically mentions Codeberg, which seems like it's just for FOSS projects.

bitbucket?

Gittea for self hosting is something I always wanted to try.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#62
post #19

What really stands out to me in this migration story isn't the technical side at all, but the reminder that "feature parity" isn't the real hurdle here. Codeberg is already good enough for most day to day workflows; what it doesn't have is the gravitational pull GitHub built through network effects, integrations, and plain old inertia.

And just sheer amount of documentation and examples out there. Everyone uses it, therefore everyone writes about it, the new hire probably knows it, and if they don't they can find it easily. Then again maybe for stuff like actions and in general CI/CD it's not all that bad, you don't need whole team to know exactly how to write it, you just need to have a person knowing it. and it's generally not all that hard to le…

This is why CI should be separate from code repository storage and that should be separate from your collaboration tools. They all can speak git if you want.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#64
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're publishing your code anywhere, it's getting trained on. MS does not restrict themselves to only training on GH-hosted code.

> If you're publishing your code anywhere, it's getting trained on citation needed. first they need to know my code exists... spend time and traffic crawling it because it's sure as hell not going to be hosted on azure... probably get detected and banned.

No citation needed. It should be an assumption and thought as a malicious cybersecurity threat.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#65

Are there any alternatives to Github that offer similar bang for the buck? Particularly for very small teams or solo devs that need private repos? The author here specifically mentions Codeberg, which seems like it's just for FOSS projects.

Stick with Github if it solves your problem. No particular reason to move off, only reasons I've seen so far is "don't like Microsoft" and "Don't like the UI". But overall, GitHub is the leading tech in this space. For FOSS, I can see why some may want to move off, but for commercial work, it's great. Seems to be a bit of a bandwagon of articles of people moving off hitting hackernews (which in reality represents a tiny percentage of users), no need to hop on the bandwagon unless you have some compelling reasons for something else.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#66
post #61

Are there any alternatives to Github that offer similar bang for the buck? Particularly for very small teams or solo devs that need private repos? The author here specifically mentions Codeberg, which seems like it's just for FOSS projects.

bitbucket? Gittea for self hosting is something I always wanted to try.

I have to interact with bitbucket on a daily basis. My advice is not just "no" but "heck no."

Bitbucket is slow to push to and pull from. From a reliability standpoint I have far more issues with Bitbucket than Github. The web UI feels completely off in a way that's hard to describe if you've never used it - it's like it was created as an afterthought or a skin on an older system, without any sort of craftsmanship behind it. There's also no source code search.

There's probably more, but quite honestly I try and stay out of the web interface of my bitbucket repos as much as humanly possible, so I shall stay happily ignorant of the rest. It's a shame, because I remember Bitbucket when it was the Github for Mercurial with a decent (if derivative) interface, and they allowed you to have private repositories without paying money.

Now, Bitbucket no longer supports Mercurial and Github gives you private repositories. Given those realities, why anybody would ever choose Bitbucket in TYOOL 2025 is beyond my ken.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#67

Are there any alternatives to Github that offer similar bang for the buck? Particularly for very small teams or solo devs that need private repos? The author here specifically mentions Codeberg, which seems like it's just for FOSS projects.

Gitlab is pretty good, plus you can self host it if you really want. It's an interesting company too, they're 100% remote.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#68
post #54
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s interesting. I would have said the opposite. I’ve never used any of the social features, but the technical aspects (including integrations) are where the value is. It does break and go down; and GHA are a real pain in the ass. But the basic hosting and PR workflow are fine.

The site UI has been going downhill these years. It's become heavy and slow, and the buttons are more and more randomly placed. Like after you search for something in the repo, to go back to the repo front page you needed to click on the most unexpected button. It's still getting things done, for sure, but no longer pleasant to work with.

I think Github has a nice UI.....when the contents finishes loading.

That's the real problem with Github these days. Too much critical information behind throbbers that take their sweet time. I find Codeberg much more responsive, despite being an ocean away and having the occasional anti-AI-scraper screen.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#69

I've noticed that several projects on the front page today (and over the past few days) are migrating away from GitHub. Is there any recent event or broader trend that explains this shift?

Honestly, I've been trying to cut down on the number of Microsoft development tools in my workflow because they are so drunk on the AI Kool-Aid that it's affecting the usability and reliability of their products in pretty much every other respect.

I don't really have a choice but to use Windows and Visual Studio 2022 for work, but I've dusted off my Sublime Text license and have been eyeing migrating my personal repositories to Codeberg.

Re: GitHub to Codeberg: my experience

#70

Are there any alternatives to Github that offer similar bang for the buck? Particularly for very small teams or solo devs that need private repos? The author here specifically mentions Codeberg, which seems like it's just for FOSS projects.

I looked into this recently. But came up with.. nothing that worked me.

I think I was looking for something like Migadu[1] for git hosting. Cheap, private and for personal use. The best option is probably to self host.

I tried to fish out some ideas with an ASK HN thread but it did not get any attention: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46011054

I have started putting my new stuff in Codeberg. Some of the private projects have manually update private mirrors on GCP (free so far).

[1] https://migadu.com/pricing/

Post reply on HN