Live data from Hacker News

Underrated reasons to be thankful V

dynomight.net

61–70 of 106 posts

Re: Underrated reasons to be thankful V

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of religious over- and undertones going on, I assume that's where you get the vibe

would you care to explain exactly what gives you the impression of religious undertones ?

The invocation of Gregory of Nyssa, for one.

Re: Underrated reasons to be thankful V

#62

> 21. That every expression graph built from differentiable elementary functions and producing a scalar output has a gradient that can itself be written as an expression graph, and furthermore that the latter expression graph is always the same size as the first one and is easy to find, and thus that it’s possible to fit very large expression graphs to data. > 22. That, eerily, biological life and biological intellig…

We haven't found anything in nature that resembles reverse-mode automatic differentiation, either in evolution or in neuroscience.

Re: Underrated reasons to be thankful V

#64
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume the contingent universe is where my existence happens and thus a potential thankfulness should be placed on. I'm for example not gonna be thankful we're not in a higher-dimension universe, because my experience would likely be unfathomably different and things might look very different from there. As history shows, Rome did win, so I wonder just how you imagine Carthage could have won? Should they just have…

In our timeline, the Cunctator, having provoked the Second Punic War through diplomatic maneuverings in his old age, held Hannibal at bay in Italy for over a decade while weakening him, until Scipio forced Hannibal to return to Africa, where the Romans defeated him. But, in another timeline, a mosquito stung the Cunctator shortly after war broke out, giving him malaria, which was then endemic in Italy. He would have…

Air currents are highly complex and almost impossible to model in detail, that does not mean that they are not the outcome of conditions that preceded them (regardless of whether we know the formula).

So why were the air currents slightly different? Oh I guess because the surrounding weather must have been slightly different. And how did that happen? Because the surrounding climate was different. And how that? Because earths development facilitated that different climate. Maybe the moon was bigger? Earths mass smaller? Well that's a big ask for a historical event we know happened on our known earth surrounded by our known moon.

Re: Underrated reasons to be thankful V

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

would you care to explain exactly what gives you the impression of religious undertones ?

The invocation of Gregory of Nyssa, for one.

it seems very clear to me that the inclusion of a singular religious reference does not justify labelling an entire excerpt as having religious over/undertones ... not sure what im missing

Re: Underrated reasons to be thankful V

#66
post #37
post #18

2. This is "regression tends to the mean" which my dad used to say with a smile when we discussed his excellent degree and his offspring's (including my) average degree.

I don't think it's regression to the mean. It looks more like mutation-selection balance. If it was regression to the mean then it would only apply to parents above the mean. Mutation-selection balance applies equally to everyone[0]: genetic load increases in each generation, and selective pressure brings it down again. [0] which is to say that mutations occur at random, not equally distributed but nearly always ther…

In hindsight, this explanation was a bit sparse, so here is the actual text from TFA:

> your baby will still be somewhat less fit compared to you and your hopefully-hot friend on average, but now there is variance, so if you cook up several babies, one of them might be as fit or even fitter than you, and that one will likely have more babies than your other babies have

This is a nearly word-for-word explanation of mutation-selection balance, e.g. check out the Wikipedia explanation:

> an equilibrium in the number of deleterious alleles in a population that occurs when the rate at which deleterious alleles are created by mutation equals the rate at which deleterious alleles are eliminated by selection

Regression to the mean is a statistical phenomenon about, well, measurements that regress to the mean. In the given quote, the average baby isn't regressing to the mean, the average baby is carrying a higher number of deleterious alleles and is less fit across the board. TFA then describes fitter babies having more babies themselves, which is irrelevant to regression to the mean but an integral part of mutation-selection balance.

Post reply on HN