This is a poor analogy. Magnus Carlsen stays because chess consumers decide to pay for humans even though they are inferior to Stockfish. BigCorp will always pick machine over you if they can.
> BigCorp will always pick machine over you if they can. But, people might not always prefer BigCorp over humans, if they can?
Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you
#62Even though cars are faster, there are still human runners.
Re: Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I'm understanding this right his ELO was 2064 in 2001 when he was 11. I don't think he was using engines for post-game analysis at 11 or maybe he was, but he was certainly born better at chess than most people. https://ratings.fide.com/profile/1503014/chart I love the original article. Hey guys you just have to be the best programmer in the world to not be replaced by AI!
> Carlsen showed an aptitude for intellectual challenges at a young age. At two years, he could solve 50-piece jigsaw puzzles; at four, he enjoyed assembling Lego sets with instructions intended for children aged 10–14. His father, a keen amateur chess player, taught him to play at the age of five, although he initially showed little interest in it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Carlsen#Childhood I don't know y…
Re: Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Carlsen showed an aptitude for intellectual challenges at a young age. At two years, he could solve 50-piece jigsaw puzzles; at four, he enjoyed assembling Lego sets with instructions intended for children aged 10–14. His father, a keen amateur chess player, taught him to play at the age of five, although he initially showed little interest in it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Carlsen#Childhood I don't know y…
I mean, I could build any lego at age 4, that didn't make me smart, just obsessed with lego, lol
Re: Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you
#65We're not all Magnus Carlsen. Some of us are hacks or very ordinary 'players', and can be replace without a ripple on the pond.
everyone is the Magnus Carlsen of their own life, though. and humans are irreplaceable. sure, budget decisions are made that cause people to have to go find another employer. but there is no civilization without people in it.