So in the beginning of the story, a google VP was mentioned, then no follow up. Why was that person there?
The death of east London's most radical bookshop
61–70 of 191 posts
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#62> Since opening, the Scarlett Letters hadn’t made a month-by-month profit, but had been kept afloat by savings and a monthly donation of £10,000 from an anonymous “angel investor”. Sounds like it wasn't so much a business as a piece of performance art.
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#63This reminds of this discussion about the closure of a 'cooperative' bookshop in New York: https://x.com/narrenhut/status/1970884747833585690
Perhaps they just "didn't feel like being customer-servicey" often enough: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8KoiQKPmXf/
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#64Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#65Performative radicalism that freaks out wider society instead of slow steady progress has led to the near complete irrelevance of the left in the west, especially the anglosphere. I mean, UK Labor is a centrist pro-capital party now. It's over.
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#66Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#67Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#68> Since opening, the Scarlett Letters hadn’t made a month-by-month profit, but had been kept afloat by savings and a monthly donation of £10,000 from an anonymous “angel investor”. Sounds like it wasn't so much a business as a piece of performance art.
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#69> Since opening, the Scarlett Letters hadn’t made a month-by-month profit, but had been kept afloat by savings and a monthly donation of £10,000 from an anonymous “angel investor”. Sounds like it wasn't so much a business as a piece of performance art.
[flagged]
Either this or my brain is just too oppressively colonial.
Re: The death of east London's most radical bookshop
#70> Since opening, the Scarlett Letters hadn’t made a month-by-month profit, but had been kept afloat by savings and a monthly donation of £10,000 from an anonymous “angel investor”. Sounds like it wasn't so much a business as a piece of performance art.