Just another day in the police state.
It's unsettling how quickly things are escalating.
Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
61–70 of 397 posts
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#62In my land of the free? No way.
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#63I've seen this other cases like this. 1. The fbi asks you to be an informant or "cooperate" with an investigation in some way. 2. If you refuse, they investigate you, and basically throw the book at you.
Every government agency works this way to the extent that they are able to. Your local building commissioner or whatever just has a lot less money and muscle on tap and much more circuitous access to court judgements in their favor than the FBI does. Differences in their strategic and tactical approach is a reflection of this.
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#64they are trying to set precedent. This can kill TOR or other privacy related services in USA easily in current environment.
Several years prior I had a coworker get arrested on CSAM charges because, you guessed it, he ran an Tor exit node. Of course there was no reporting on the Tor aspect, just “local man arrested for CSAM” in the local papers. He eventually had the charges dropped after years of court battles, but his name is forever tarnished as a result. This particular job we had a lot of idealist folks, two of whom ran relays - they…
Even from the early days of Tor I remember all of the warnings to not run an exit node in a country where internet activity was likely to lead to prosecution.
Running any sort of proxy (including Tor exit nodes) allows other people’s traffic to appear as your traffic. That’s the entire purpose of the software. You’d have to be willing and able to handle the consequences of any traffic any other person decides to send through the system.
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#65they are trying to set precedent. This can kill TOR or other privacy related services in USA easily in current environment.
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#66[flagged]
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#67[flagged]
The part that should really enrage you is the way people will selectively understand this based on whether they agree or disagree with the context. If some electronics repair guy repairing vehicle ECUs in bulk who doesn't ask questions but has an inkling that they're gonna get used for emissions laws violations got rolled up on by the feds for refusing to go out of his way to help them out HN would find all sorts of…
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#68Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right? Just wanted to understand your point.
> By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right? Yup. https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-organized-crim...
Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node
#70they are trying to set precedent. This can kill TOR or other privacy related services in USA easily in current environment.
Several years prior I had a coworker get arrested on CSAM charges because, you guessed it, he ran an Tor exit node. Of course there was no reporting on the Tor aspect, just “local man arrested for CSAM” in the local papers. He eventually had the charges dropped after years of court battles, but his name is forever tarnished as a result. This particular job we had a lot of idealist folks, two of whom ran relays - they…