61–70 of 409 posts
Holding money (or crypto) in PayPal is a terrible idea. They are not a bank, they do not abide by banking regulations. They can lock you out of your account and your money at any time and leave you going in circles with their offshore support. Yes, they are somewhat of a necessary evil if you do any online peer-to-peer buying/selling, since they are the only money transfer service that provides some level of "buyer p…
Holding money (or crypto) in PayPal is a terrible idea. They are not a bank, they do not abide by banking regulations. They can lock you out of your account and your money at any time and leave you going in circles with their offshore support. Yes, they are somewhat of a necessary evil if you do any online peer-to-peer buying/selling, since they are the only money transfer service that provides some level of "buyer p…
In europe, Paypal Sarl is a bank subject to bank regulations
Edit: The above means that deposits on your PayPal account aren’t insured, different from regular bank accounts in the EU. This is a frequently emphasized caveat regarding the use of PayPal as a bank account in the EU.
Holding money (or crypto) in PayPal is a terrible idea. They are not a bank, they do not abide by banking regulations. They can lock you out of your account and your money at any time and leave you going in circles with their offshore support. Yes, they are somewhat of a necessary evil if you do any online peer-to-peer buying/selling, since they are the only money transfer service that provides some level of "buyer p…
one thing with these stablecoins is they're pushing to buying of 'us-debt'. congrats if you buy a stablecoin - you've effectively financed the US gvt at 0%. now the US gvt can inflate away that debt at 0 cost to them, and pass on the cost to you. that's why a bunch of these stablecoin companies are pushing it as a way to save for people in distressed economies. what a way to steal from the poor. that's why the crypto…
didn't you just explain the USD game? (fleecing the poor worldwide through inflation...) stablecoins don't change much in this.
Holding money (or crypto) in PayPal is a terrible idea. They are not a bank, they do not abide by banking regulations. They can lock you out of your account and your money at any time and leave you going in circles with their offshore support. Yes, they are somewhat of a necessary evil if you do any online peer-to-peer buying/selling, since they are the only money transfer service that provides some level of "buyer p…
I thought the whole point of a decentralised ledger was not needing companies like PayPal…
The reality is, we will have a mix of custodian - through third-party - and self-sovereign usage; depending on the context and user's skill
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not how any of this works. You may not receive any interest on your stablecoin balance, but the issuer certainly does. Why would they offer to lend money to the US government at zero when they can get the market rate and pocket it? What's more, these are mostly short-term instruments This means any increase in inflation will be reflected in their yield.
> You may not receive any interest on your stablecoin balance, but the issuer certainly does A bunch of zero marginal cost capital funding purchases of U.S. debt would absolutely push down rates, possibly lower than inflation, because if you’re a stablecoin issuer you’re not constrained by yield. This is a dumb-money venture. And if there is this much money that is this dumb, Treasuries aren’t the worst place for it…