Live data from Hacker News

I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

grell.dev

61–70 of 419 posts

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#61

> Unfortunately they thanked me for my application but said the team doesn't have the capacity to review additional applications. It seems like they didn't even look at his application.

Maybe Anthropic uses Workday for its HR, which is being sued for possible systematic discrimination by AI. (See links below)

https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/06/workday-ai-lawsui...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/janicegassam/2025/06/23/what-th...

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#62
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it kind of happened, he went through seven interviews. from the same post: > But ultimately, should Google have hired me? Yes, absolutely yes. I am often a dick, I am often difficult, I often don’t know computer science, but. BUT. I make really good things, maybe they aren't perfect, but people really like them. Surely, surely Google could have used that.

The #1 way to not get hired is to be a dick. The brilliant asshole is the most toxic person you can have on your team. Don’t be an asshole.

Founders of a lot of companies also tend to be dicks. But seems to do alright. Seems to be a double standard there

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#63

I wonder if it was geolocation? Anthropic is based in SF, the author seems to be based in Munich, and maybe they're not open to hiring people who aren't based in the US right now? Given the state of US visas right now, this wouldn't shock me.

London too.

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#66
I'm very much starting to re-consider open source. It mainly seems to be a way for already incredibly wealthy companies to get things for free, or to strategically release things to crush their competitors.

Maybe we ought to go back to paying for proprietary software. A lot of people used to make money that way, ie by selling their own desktop app.

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#67
post #47

There is some dirty secret i learned in my time as a eng. manager: Working in open source / Being the maintainer of a popular library / Blogging about software: All this things won't give you necessarily a competitive edge but can work against you. It's counterintuitive but sometimes teams are looking for a more low-profile hire.

How so? Care to elaborate? I get that bloggers/educators can sometimes be not the best fit for IC roles but doing open source seems like a huge advantage.

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#68
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it kind of happened, he went through seven interviews. from the same post: > But ultimately, should Google have hired me? Yes, absolutely yes. I am often a dick, I am often difficult, I often don’t know computer science, but. BUT. I make really good things, maybe they aren't perfect, but people really like them. Surely, surely Google could have used that.

The #1 way to not get hired is to be a dick. The brilliant asshole is the most toxic person you can have on your team. Don’t be an asshole.

Exactly this. No amount of cred, smarts, and genius that ends with "and I'm a bit of dick" will save you from my automatic red-line veto when hiring. I'm far from alone in this.

Re: I gave the AI arms and legs then it rejected me

#70
post #47

There is some dirty secret i learned in my time as a eng. manager: Working in open source / Being the maintainer of a popular library / Blogging about software: All this things won't give you necessarily a competitive edge but can work against you. It's counterintuitive but sometimes teams are looking for a more low-profile hire.

How so? Care to elaborate? I get that bloggers/educators can sometimes be not the best fit for IC roles but doing open source seems like a huge advantage.

It might be similar to how employers dislike hiring entrepreneurs. People who already have a career bigger than their job
Post reply on HN