Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then they would just get removed in Australia, not worldwide.
My guess is that Steam wasn't able to adequately block the games in Austrailia. If people use a VPN to access the content, could Steam still be liable?
Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
61–70 of 621 posts
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#62What's stopping a large, profitable company like Valve from starting its own payment processor? Surely the technology part of it can't be an impossible hurdle.
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#63A classic tale. Finger pointing between merchants, card providers and banks. All of them: it was someone else!
In this story, Itch and Valve are 10x more trustworthy than the card processors.
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#64Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#65Unfortunately, laws like EU AML law go the opposite direction, where banks are allowed to close accounts only if they deem them "too risky".. this is not good.
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then they would just get removed in Australia, not worldwide.
My guess is that Steam wasn't able to adequately block the games in Austrailia. If people use a VPN to access the content, could Steam still be liable?
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#67The US has some clear laws against government controlling speech and, in the abstract, that makes it pretty much impossible to censor games. Various factions - exactly who it is difficult to pin down - have been working hard to set up a system where they can shut things down without ever explicitly instructing anyone to do anything. This appears to be the system engaging by accident because some crazy from Australia…
> "The US has some clear laws against government controlling speech and, in the abstract, that makes it pretty much impossible to censor games." For background, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchan... ( "Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association" (2011) ( "ruling that video games were protected speech under the First Amendment as other forms of media" ))
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#68[flagged]
>Bewildering to see the outrage over this. Get real, cleaning up the smut is not an attack on free speech or democracy. Sure, religious fascists enjoy this now, next they will remove GTA and shooter games, metal music and Hip HOp and when some Rust fanboy extremist will complain C++ and PHP content will be removed for safety reasons. We need to complain so religious fascist content is removed too
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#69Full title that doesn't fit in the HN headline: "Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down, but Valve says payment processors 'specifically cited' a Mastercard rule about damaging the brand" (For the people who don't click the link to read the article.)
But it's hard to say. Mastercard is now saying that they never said or did anything. So where did the outrage come from? Someone must have done something.
Re: Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down
#70What's stopping a large, profitable company like Valve from starting its own payment processor? Surely the technology part of it can't be an impossible hurdle.