This isn't ambiguous. This is really clear evidence of (at minimum) an atrocious and continuing war crime with full intentionality. Realistically, it is more likely explicitly genocidal in intent.
[flagged]
IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
61–70 of 1001 posts
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#62Why though, what does it achieve? Do they want to make sure that there will be terrorists / freedom fighters in the future so that they have a reason not to negotiate? Because they expect to "win" if violence continues?
That's why Israel has systematically taken out every hospital in Gaza: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdd25d9vp2qo
Has blocked and sabotaged aid at every turn, including bombing UN food trucks: https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/01/1158746
And when allied countries got too uneasy about them just blocking all aid trucks at the border, they set up their own aid organization to trickle out nominal amounts of food while they take pot shots at people desperate enough to show up: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74ne108e4vo
They didn't just make this up as they go, presumably the plans have been sitting around for a long time waiting for a suitable moment.
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Please don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. It only makes things worse.
Your comment would be just fine without those bits.
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#64Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Other commenters are doing it too, but it's a matter of degree, and the rhetoric in your post here is a degree worse. You can make your substantive points without resorting to "cult", "stamped out", "criminal ideology" and so on. Fortunately it doesn't look like your account has a habit of doing this, so it should be easy to fix.
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#66This isn't ambiguous. This is really clear evidence of (at minimum) an atrocious and continuing war crime with full intentionality. Realistically, it is more likely explicitly genocidal in intent.
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#67The biggest problem with this isn’t the horror of the actual war crime. The far more serious concern are the lengths the government will go to avoid holding anyone accountable. That is so much worse because it unintentionally endorses future crimes and challenges the offenders to take ever more offensive actions without fear of consequences.
Why would the government hold someone accountable for its own actions? Let’s not pretend that this is just some random soldiers doing this, this is exactly what the Israeli government wants.
As far as I can tell Israel doesn't particularly care for even looking like it's trying to behave responsibly. I don't think they've held anyone responsible for even some of the most obvious war crimes we have evidence of being committed.
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> This is a delusional take, please stop pretending Please don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. It only makes things worse. Your comment would be just fine without those bits. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#69[flagged]
Re: IDF officers ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near Gaza food distribution sites
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do realise that the people writing for Haaretz are also nationals of that country right? Maybe learn to be precise, helps in all situations.
Israel here obviously standing for "the current government of Israel" (with presumed majority support), not "every single Israeli person". Fortunately many Israelis are against the ongoing genocide, but powerless to stop it.
All this to say you're right, but the government is indocrinating more and more people for these views.