61–70 of 124 posts
Also filter conditions that would be interesting - size of PR, language, files affected, distinct organizations etc. lmk if these get added please!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude Code isn’t a complete agent - it cannot open PRs autonomously AFAIK
Yeah it can. Either using MCP or git via bash. It’s a glaring omission and calls the data into question. How is attribution done? If it’s via the agent taking credit in commit messages, that’s a problem because Claude code, for example, has a config parameter that lets you tell it to not credit itself. With Claude code completely missing I’d say this is wildly inaccurate.
Glad it’s missing until they fix this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe these are all "background" agents that, by default, are meant to write code and issue pull requests without you watching/babysitting/guiding the process. I haven't used Claude Code in a while, but from what I recall, it's not that.
Claude Code can run in background and I don't see why it wouldn't be able to create pull requests if you gave it such a tool.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah it can. Either using MCP or git via bash. It’s a glaring omission and calls the data into question. How is attribution done? If it’s via the agent taking credit in commit messages, that’s a problem because Claude code, for example, has a config parameter that lets you tell it to not credit itself. With Claude code completely missing I’d say this is wildly inaccurate.
The problem with Claude code is it doesn’t let you walk away. You have to press yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 500 times. Glad it’s missing until they fix this.
Where is Claude Code? Surprised to see it completely left out of this analysis.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude Code can run in background and I don't see why it wouldn't be able to create pull requests if you gave it such a tool.
How to tell CC to accept everything. It’s frustrating to need to press yes yes yes yes.
Total PRs between Codex vs Cursor is 208K vs 705, this is an enormous difference in absolute PRs. Since cursor is very popular, how does their PRs is not even 1% of codex PRs?.
I didn't even realize Cursor could make PRs. I thought most people would create PRs themselves once they were happy with a series of commits.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah it can. Either using MCP or git via bash. It’s a glaring omission and calls the data into question. How is attribution done? If it’s via the agent taking credit in commit messages, that’s a problem because Claude code, for example, has a config parameter that lets you tell it to not credit itself. With Claude code completely missing I’d say this is wildly inaccurate.
The problem with Claude code is it doesn’t let you walk away. You have to press yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 500 times. Glad it’s missing until they fix this.