TeleMessage Explorer: a new open source research tool
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: TeleMessage Explorer: a new open source research tool
#62I don’t understand the value proposition of TeleMessage. Uses Signal but defeats the point of using Signal. Why not use a proper centralized chat with actual retention and encryption?
The actual implementation here is atrocious though.
Re: TeleMessage Explorer: a new open source research tool
#63I don’t understand the value proposition of TeleMessage. Uses Signal but defeats the point of using Signal. Why not use a proper centralized chat with actual retention and encryption?
I kind of feel the same way about Signal itself due to its reliance on phone numbers.
Re: TeleMessage Explorer: a new open source research tool
#64What seemed to be interesting from the email addresses disclosed is that there are a hell of a lot of people engaged in finance, investment or trading of one sort or another. There are a few there with enough emails for it to be relatively widespread within the institution: Scotiabank, JPMorgan, KKR and Jeffries stand out -- Scotiabank has hundreds of emails, I imagine they're having a bad week. Also a lot of energy…
Re: TeleMessage Explorer: a new open source research tool
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the only way to do that is to have a modified client My firm requires screenshots. If the concern is that someone would bypass that, well, someone could bypass TeleMessage, too.
One has to wonder what type of legal requirement this satisfies. It certainly wouldn’t hold up to the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard for US criminal prosecution. I’ve been exposed to “lit holds” for various document management system before and usually a third party such as Box or Microsoft can attest to the immutability of files placed under lit hold, and/or there is an audit trail to make sure the chain of cu…