Live data from Hacker News

A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

twitter.com

61–70 of 404 posts

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#61
post #58

[flagged]

That's the good thing about conspiracy theories. Hard to falsify.

When patterns become too obvious, just label them "conspiracy theories." Much easier than explaining why critical infrastructure leaks consistently benefit the same interests.

Funny how skepticism disappears when billionaires dismantle democracy—that's just "innovation," right?

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#62
post #33
post #18

This tells me all I need to know: # Read the CSV file df = pd.read_csv(csv_file) Thanks for the explanatory comment Jordan /s

Generating boring one off analysis scripts is the best use case for AI code writing, so can’t fault them for doing so. For serious projects I found LLMs—even cutting edge Claude Sonnet 3.7 in agent mode—just can’t generate a large amount of code with the level of consistency and quality I expect and fixing such code is barely faster than writing it myself with AI autocomplete. But little scripts that I throw away aft…

Yes you can because they are accessing sensitive government data with it and that requires more time effort and care than the barest of bare minimum...

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#63
post #19
post #18

This tells me all I need to know: # Read the CSV file df = pd.read_csv(csv_file) Thanks for the explanatory comment Jordan /s

You can even tell that's ChatGPT rather than, say, Claude. Redundant obvious comments are a stylistic signature of their models.

That would be expected of generative predictive ai.

The comments that are most likely to correlate strongly with the code are the useless redundant ones.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#64

A surprisingly large amount of data one might think is classified is not at all. In this case all the examples listed are from freely available public data outside of the Twitter thing which seems to be just setting up the environment for some local tool. Here are the sites: --- datacatalog.worldbank.org opendata.arcgis.com mrdata.usgs.gov / www.usgs.gov --- Sharing things like this isn't very useful because it just…

Yeah the "sensitive geospatial data" is just open data. He also created the geospatial gists before trump was in office so he definitely didn't have access to critical data then https://web.archive.org/web/20250228230950/https://gist.gith...

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#65

A bit more on Jordan Wick: https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/doge-agent-jordan-wick/ I'm a bit on the edge regarding to why someone on DOGE should collect data on critical infrastructure, even if it's available to the public audience for free. I'm also quite worried by the possibility to filter federal workers based on the union status

> I'm also quite worried by the possibility to filter federal workers based on the union status

Well, from a purely day-to-day, operational HR standpoint, that information is important. Like many things, in the wrong hands it’s easily abused.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#66

[flagged]

What a weird thing to say. They are slashing and burning government and routing the permanent bureaucracy of democrats that run the country no matter who wins the election. That’s simply what the GOP has been promising to do for decades, but has been too feckless to do until now.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#68

A surprisingly large amount of data one might think is classified is not at all. In this case all the examples listed are from freely available public data outside of the Twitter thing which seems to be just setting up the environment for some local tool. Here are the sites: --- datacatalog.worldbank.org opendata.arcgis.com mrdata.usgs.gov / www.usgs.gov --- Sharing things like this isn't very useful because it just…

[deleted]

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#69

Sadly his github is now private and the archived pages are mostly previews, not full repos.

Just search for forks: https://github.com/PatrickFanella/x-dm-downloader for example. We will probably have a short while (day or two) before false DMCA notices about this are actioned by GitHub

Looks like they used it to scrape the DMs for the @doge account, as they are calling for people to report "fraud" there. Crazy that the US government is allowing a third party such as X to have such control.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#70

A bit tangent, and since I’m an outsider who doesn’t live in the states and have no skin in the game — my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable. I can’t even imagine how you can backtrack this, and fix stuff up. They obviously prepared for it months in advance. Targeting ex-employees of successful product companies and putting them in…

Succeed at what?

For example, they canceled invasive species control programs for the Great Lakes. Is it a success that they saved a modest amount of money, while letting the condition of the lakes further erode?

Post reply on HN