Live data from Hacker News

India's Tata Consultancy Was Gaming the US Visa System

bloomberg.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: India's Tata Consultancy Was Gaming the US Visa System

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PhD from MIT could very well earn less than a mid range developer even though they are contributing much more to the society and country. Also salary war would mean companies face pressure to increase the salary of immigrants over the citizens.

> PhD from MIT could very well earn less than a mid range developer even though they are contributing much more to the society and country. If this is true, the supply of such people should be reduced (i.e. don't hand out H1B visas to them), so that by the laws of supply and demand the salaries increase for them.

The problem is that research is not as beneficial to the company at least in the short term. e.g. Google wouldn't be affected much if quantum computing divison is shut down, but would be affected if google ads stops showing, even though the quality of people working in former is likely higher.

Re: India's Tata Consultancy Was Gaming the US Visa System

#62
post #51
post #7

The easiest way to solve this is to salary rank the H1B applicants. Those with the highest salaries get picked; not the ‘lucky ones’ that get through a lottery, which puts a PhD from MIT and a new hire at Tata from a no name school in India on equal footing. And I say this as someone who was on H1B. The current system benefits no one but these visa mills. Edit: for grammar

A better way is to do away with the quotas to stop all the gaming around it. Switch to a price-based system by imposing a tariff on a percentage of the salary either on the company or on the worker. This would ensure a certain wage premium for local workers to ease the political pressure. This type of policy is more flexible since the tariff can vary based on the nature of the job. After a certain number of years or…

Yeah the only way an extra tax would be fair for the worker would be to think of it like a fee for PR. Otherwise it's just discrimination.
Post reply on HN