Live data from Hacker News

Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

reuters.com

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#61
post #8

Sam’s reply on twitter[0] no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want [0] https://x.com/sama/status/1889059531625464090 ?

Elon's response: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889062013109703009

> Swindler

In another tweet chain: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889063777792069911

> Scam Altman

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#62
post #21

He also has several investors backing him, including Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital, Atreides Management, Vy Capital and 8VC, a venture firm led by Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale. Ari Emanuel, CEO of Hollywood company Endeavor, is also backing the offer through his investment fund.

....Atreides Management?

The financing arm of a aristocratic line running a personality cult and who have a nepo baby on the cards contemplating a little bit of jyhad as his ticket out?

....I Do sometimes wonder who comes up with these names.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#64
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://xcancel.com/sama/status/1889059531625464090 , for those of us without an account.

FYI X has relaxed the login prompt (at least for me). You can again see the post without an account, but not the thread.

Nope, not interested.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This doesn't seem to have anything to do with bluesky. What connection are you trying to draw?

There are a lot of bluesky users who really hate Musk and they post a lot whenever he does anything.

Yes, exactly, I thought this was clear. Thank you!

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like petty internet arguments, I can't help appreciate him referring to it as Twitter.

[flagged]

Musk deadnames his own child, I think it's fine to not be considerate to him.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like petty internet arguments, I can't help appreciate him referring to it as Twitter.

[flagged]

setting aside the understanding of hypocrisy as entirely negative, deadnaming is bad because it can allow for unwanted tracking/attention, and because it might be offensive/hurtful for the person you are calling a name that they do not use.

neither of those issues apply for companies. unless you've relentlessly refrained from calling McDonald's "mickey D's" (or any other company, any name other than their company name) specifically because you "might offend them" (they have a "preferred" name, that's why they put it everywhere), then you're not applying the rule universally. and if you worry that using "twitter" in place of "x" would somehow allow for stalking of the company that the real name would prevent, I would love to see any rational justification for that concern.

rules - of morality or otherwise - are reasonable to follow only when they have some net benefit. even by the low standards of an edgelord trying to apply rules where they would be ironic, this fails the test of even applying the rules correctly.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#68
> Elon's offer to purchase the OpenAI nonprofit for $97.4billion isn't going to happen, but it may seriously complicate OpenAI's efforts to claim the nonprofit is fairly valued at $40billion. If you won't sell it for $97.4billion, that means you think it's worth more than that.

https://x.com/KelseyTuoc/status/1889064215710941594

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#69

OpenAI is not worth more than 9.74 billion, considering their moat is steadily shrinking and their models aren't even open. Even if OpenAI produces their chips via TSMC, it means that at least AMD can do the same, if not anyone else with just 100 million to spend.

OpenAI is the 6th most popular website in the world and if someone's going to kill Google, it's them. If they IPO'd today, they'd easily be worth hundreds of billions if not more.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#70
post #5

So, from what I have read about spinning a for-profit off from a non-profit, the for-profit needs to be purchased from the non-profit at market value. There have been a lot of questions about how MSFT or OpenAI's other investors would fund the purchase of the for-profit entity. I think what this does is set a floor valuation with a fully backed bid that the non-profit would get IN CASH for essentially buying the for…

I don't know that this sets a floor, really. There's already a valuation, set by its own preferred investors. I'd think $97b is almost definitely below that. And do the nonprofit board members have the same fiduciary as a typical for-profit board?
Post reply on HN