Live data from Hacker News

Uncut Currency

usmint.gov

61–70 of 421 posts

Re: Uncut Currency

#61

Why is the US one of the few countries that can't keep a consistent design across their bills and still does not have a way for blind people to identify which note they have. They are all the same size and have no embossed markings.

The US is so weird about its currency. The repeated attempts to get rid of the dollar bill (dollar coins, two-dollar bill, etc.) have all "failed".

I put "failed" in quotes, because all it requires is for the government to do it. Take the one-dollar bills out of circulation, no discussion, done. At this point, take the two-dollar bills (no one will notice) and the penny as well.

Re: Uncut Currency

#62
post #44
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The one that irked me the most was his cameo for a dubious crypto startup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38855645 He does a lot of public speaking the quality can be gauged by searching "Steve Wozniak conference", and his attendance can be bought https://www.aurumbureau.com/speaker/steve-wozniak/ What kind of message a person who is getting paid by the platform is going to have? I'm overall not very trusting of…

Fair enough, I agree he's super out of touch, just wanted to make sure he wasn't speaking at something really really bad. To save anyone else a google: he is indeed behind a crypto project properly it seems, and the token looks very much like a rug[1], and the cameo thing is real and it seems odd he's not savvy enough to do some background on it/know not to shill NFTs[2]. Speaking fee thing doesn't bother me personal…

Good for him—don’t think he got the big money aapl generated as he got out quite early.

Re: Uncut Currency

#64
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's been a very very long time since I've seen a silver quarter in circulation.

There were enough to make searching worthwhile. Then people switched to half-dollars. I assume the supply is cleaned out now, though. I did get a silver quarter in circulation maybe a decade ago, in change at a pop-up farmer's market stand. I recognized it immediately: it's a whiter, more satiny look.

Their sound is also subtly different that you can pick up if you pay attention. I used to swap silver quarters out of the till when I worked a cash register and I could tell without even looking that someone was about to hand me a silver quarter or dime.

Re: Uncut Currency

#65
post #43
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The individual notes on uncut currency sheets are legal tender. It doesn't say that the whole sheet would be considered as a collection of legal tender. So far I see that the individual notes are legal tender, it doesn't say what happens if you cut it. Everything it says is about uncut currency sheets.

> it doesn't say what happens if you cut it. It does though? > Can I cut uncut currency sheets? What happens if the notes on my sheet were cut apart? > Because the individual notes on uncut currency sheets are legal tender, they may be cut apart and spent. Were you to do this, they would only be valued at their face value, even though you would have paid more than their cumulative value for the uncut currency sheet.

Interesting up to what section they can be cut out, can it just be the two serial numbers and the denomination? Then the back of the notes becomes just "In God We Trust"

Re: Uncut Currency

#66

Why do these sell for so much more than the value of the note?

If I recall correctly this is because someone found an infinite money glitch and used a credit card that had a big cash back. So he would buy the bills then deposit into his bank account and pay of his credit cards. So now they increased the price to more than the face value.

But that's just stupidity of the seller. You must account for credit card fees when you sell anything.

Here the issue is that they're several times more expensive than their printed value, hardly the same issue.

Re: Uncut Currency

#68
post #44
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The one that irked me the most was his cameo for a dubious crypto startup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38855645 He does a lot of public speaking the quality can be gauged by searching "Steve Wozniak conference", and his attendance can be bought https://www.aurumbureau.com/speaker/steve-wozniak/ What kind of message a person who is getting paid by the platform is going to have? I'm overall not very trusting of…

Fair enough, I agree he's super out of touch, just wanted to make sure he wasn't speaking at something really really bad. To save anyone else a google: he is indeed behind a crypto project properly it seems, and the token looks very much like a rug[1], and the cameo thing is real and it seems odd he's not savvy enough to do some background on it/know not to shill NFTs[2]. Speaking fee thing doesn't bother me personal…

Took me a while to connect your username to the IRC nick. Cheers!

Re: Uncut Currency

#69
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The video where he is showcasing it.. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDHTkowSkUM/

reading the comments gave me a headache...

It's instagram.

Slight tangent: the YouTube comments used to be famous for being a vile cesspit. Then Google changed something, and now they are full of positivity. Often too full.

Re: Uncut Currency

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pre-existing conditions, which as far as I'm aware, is a US-only concept. I'm happy to be corrected for that, though.

> Pre-existing conditions, which as far as I'm aware, is a US-only concept Most of the world's population has no concept of socialised heath insurance. Pre-existing or novel. Someone in a wheelchair, or who is blind or mute, is much better accomodated in America than in most of Europe. (In part because the former is richer.)

>Someone in a wheelchair, or who is blind or mute, is much better accomodated in America than in most of Europe. (In part because the former is richer.)

I guess it just depends on who you talk to and their particular values.

I love my country, but to give a bit of a counter point : I am paralyzed due to a cervical spine injury.

Medicare will pay 80% of the cost of a new chair after payment of deductible once every 5 years. They do not cover maintenance and repair in most cases.

A decent mid-range power-chair with posture and repositioning aids costs between 15k-25k. The air cushion for this chair to prevent pressure sores costs 400-800usd.

So, essentially, that means that a permanently disabled person making the high SSDI income of 18k a year is going to be asked to pay 4.5k USD out of pocket every 5 years just in order to take advantage of the offers from Medicare -- and this isn't including repair, wear and replacement of items, or the short 1-2 year life span of most air cushions. By the time the chair hits the next replacement window it will have gone through 2-3 500-800usd cushions and numerous other repairs.

To contrast : My friends with similar injuries who are insured under the British NHS receive a voucher for a new chair every 3-5 years. They receive vouchers for repair at local shops. Cushion replacement is deemed necessary during the repair process and they are replaced w/ vouchers as needed, not on a schedule.

It's all grass-is-always-greener thinking. The NHS has huge problems, too. But as a wheelchair user I can't wholly agree with the take that we're better accommodated over in the U.S. in any absolute sense.

Post reply on HN