61–70 of 240 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost* all of them. At the very least its worth hoarding until an opportunity comes up. [*] Reduced from all.
No way. I know a local photographer who has his own printer and store and makes prints and would never sell my prints away.
This is just an ad for their photo service. Which presumably has terrible search features, if it doesn't use AI to analyse them. That's one of the best features in Google Photos!
Terrible search without AI is a bit of a stretch. Also Google does not have a monopoly on object/face recognition in photos. There are self-hosted solutions that readily provide you with that without feeding a faceless AI with your photos while boiling the ocean.
> “On a dataset of human-written essays, we find that gpt-3.5-turbo can accurately infer demographic information about the authors from just the essay text, and suspect it's inferring much more.
> Every time we sit down in front of an LLM like GPT-4, it starts with a blank slate. It knows nothing about who we are, other than what it knows about users in general. But with every word we type, we reveal more about ourselves -- our beliefs, our personality, our education level, even our gender. Just how clearly does the model see us by the end of the conversation, and why should that worry us?“
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dLg7CyeTE4pqbbcnp/language-m...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The service is end to end encrypted with local AI for indexing. I tried it a few months ago however and the upload/encryption was so slow from their desktop app it would have taken weeks to migrate my photos to the service.
Apple Photos in iCloud can also be E2E encrypted (though not by default: you have to explicitly enable that), are indexed locally, and Apple's pricing for storage is about half of this service.
This is just an ad for their photo service. Which presumably has terrible search features, if it doesn't use AI to analyse them. That's one of the best features in Google Photos!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where is the difference in trust level between google and openai coming from?
One company has the capacity to maintain HIPAA compliance and the other is best known for vacuuming up the entire web and users prompts. For something as sensitive as family photos, I know which company/product I'd prefer for this potential project.
> PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE TERMS CONTAIN A BINDING ARBITRATION PROVISION AND CLASS ACTION/JURY TRIAL WAIVER.
These are common in the US, and consistently upheld in the US. Curiously, Ente did not add the opt-out provision they have in their usual ToS (https://ente.io/terms). I wonder why they made their Terms more restrictive for this specific service only.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where is the difference in trust level between google and openai coming from?
One company has the capacity to maintain HIPAA compliance and the other is best known for vacuuming up the entire web and users prompts. For something as sensitive as family photos, I know which company/product I'd prefer for this potential project.
a) it didnt catch that they were made of ground pork and not beef b) it didnt realize that the inconsistent browning and look of the fat was from butter browing the breadcrumbs and flour c) it didnt realize that the surrounding on the pan was bits of browned meat that fell off while rolling, instead claiming it was garlic or herbs d) it didnt spot that one had fallen apart a little bit e) it didnt get that i took the picture because i thought i rolled them too big f) it made up a counter, when only the cast iron pan was visible
with a different picture, it couldnt figure out what my makeshift Halloween costume was, despite it having been a pretty obvious squid games character.
it seems like it can see whats in the picture mechanically, but it can't see what the picture is of. whats the point of all this ai photo stuff if i cant give it a picture of a cake and have it tell me to turn down my oven a couple degrees next time?