> The skills built up by European carmakers over decades are simply not directly transferrable. Germany does have a giant, excellent chemistry industry. > China's interest in batteries is not a recent trend. It has been investing in their production for many, many years. It has been attempting to dominate not just the production of cells but also of the cathodes and anodes that go inside them - not to mention the che…
Yes but the level of investment the Chinese have poured into battery production and EVs in general is also completely unparalleled. Industrial policy is nothing new for US and EU but just not at that level. To be able to compete with China the West would need to: - Match generous subsidies to companies, not just through banks but at the government level by building entire towns just for battery production. - Making l…
The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
61–68 of 68 posts
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're ignoring the fact that we also don't want oceans of toxic sludge left after the mining. This is not the case in China.
The Mountain Pass mine solved that problem years ago. What they couldn't solve was making money during periods when China cut rare earth prices.
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#63A few months ago I was looking for an EV. Went to the local Citroen/Peugeot dealership (I live in France), asked what they had. They told me I could have the new e-C3, the basic model, with 300KM range, for ~35000€. I asked how long it would take to have the car once I ordered it. They told me six months. A few weeks later I went to the local MG dealership. They told me I could have an MG4, the high-end model (heated…
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#64> The skills built up by European carmakers over decades are simply not directly transferrable. Germany does have a giant, excellent chemistry industry. > China's interest in batteries is not a recent trend. It has been investing in their production for many, many years. It has been attempting to dominate not just the production of cells but also of the cathodes and anodes that go inside them - not to mention the che…
> Consistent, long term industrial policy is very effective. Yes. This is what kills the US in rare earths, cobalt, gallium, etc. US mines shut down when the price goes down. Sometimes they restart when the price goes up. Sometimes they don't. All this churn makes the business unprofitable in the US.[1] [1] https://mpmaterials.com/articles/mp-materials-reports-third-...
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#65Europe doesn't make the best cars, USA doesn't make the best planes, Japan doesn't make the best electronics. What a time to live in. Anyway, that's all fine. Those are all huge and diverse economies, will re-group and stabilize.
I still think Europe makes the best cars. But being the best is never enough to also sell high volumes. Europe is stagnating due to an ever-increasing set of regulations, higher taxes (partially required to enforce those regulations and a shrinking labor force) and specially the effect that those have on the motivation of the most skilled workers: killing it. Me and my wife have tried starting a couple of businesses,…
Anyway, I don't think that it has anything with regulations or taxes. It's the attitude of Europeans. You can see how European GDPs have fallen short after 2008 but that's not because regulations kicked in in 2008 but because, IMHO, the way they handled the economical crisis.
Also, Europeans have a different understanding of what startup is supposed to do, they appear to think that its computer based high margin small business and Americans appear to believe that its supposed to be a business that should grow extremely fast and doesn't have to have any profit until it captures the market and establishes monopoly.
The American way creates huge wealth but creates a lot of suffering and stagnation once the startup reaches the profit making phase. This is a no-go for the Europeans, its something that the public demands be tackled and its something that EU tries to do with giant tech corporations and that's what makes the American businesses hate EU.
I don't know if European public will accept having american-like wealth concentration at the top. The vibe in Europe is that we should all have a dignified life quality and un USA they are O.K. with having people in extreme poverty at the same street with 40 Billion dollar company HQ. When they are too annoyed by all that poor, their solution ideas are something like "let's move somewhere else", "let's buy a land and create a new city where we don't have these people around" or "let's kick out these people and make them someone else's problem".
Yes, the American way creates huge wealth but I'm not convinced that its an improvement over over European way. Also, don't look just for EU vs USA, take at look at China, Japan and Singapore who also managed to built great wealth or innovation without forcing part of the population in poverty.
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#66> The skills built up by European carmakers over decades are simply not directly transferrable. Germany does have a giant, excellent chemistry industry. > China's interest in batteries is not a recent trend. It has been investing in their production for many, many years. It has been attempting to dominate not just the production of cells but also of the cathodes and anodes that go inside them - not to mention the che…
What I find puzzling is that around 10 years ago Audi and VW committed fully to electric vehicles, investing $100 billion(?). So why do people now claim they missed the boat on EV development?
- Because they can invest and still fail.
- Because a press release and actual money spent on reasearch are two very different things.
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#67A few months ago I was looking for an EV. Went to the local Citroen/Peugeot dealership (I live in France), asked what they had. They told me I could have the new e-C3, the basic model, with 300KM range, for ~35000€. I asked how long it would take to have the car once I ordered it. They told me six months. A few weeks later I went to the local MG dealership. They told me I could have an MG4, the high-end model (heated…
The US car makers are also doing their best to screw it up. Chevy had an EV, the Bolt, that gets pretty good reviews. They had some kinks the first few years but seem to have gotten them worked out. And with the tax EV tax incentives a Bolt was around $20k (around $28k without incentives). Range of around 250 miles (400 km). Then they announced in early 23 that it was being discontinued to make room for their "new ge…
The LT trim of the 2025 Equinox EV is under $35,000 MSRP. Which puts it at under $27,500 with the $7,500 Federal Tax Credit.
Re: The electric shock behind Europe's stuttering EV future
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
China is of no concern to Europe or the US. Most of their tech is stolen or trickles down from innovation elsewhere. It is unlikely China will find success in the US given the sentiment (antiChinese sentiment is rampant in most of the US). Also, there are many legislations in place that would prevent it. I will mention though that the US and Europe need to get their act together. Too slow on EVs (it took an outsider…
> Most of their tech is stolen or trickles down from innovation elsewhere. This is how it always works, until it doesn't. Why is everyone so quick to forget that Japan was the exact same way in the 70s and 80s?